BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8632241)

  • 1. Methohexital infusion technique for conscious sedation.
    Johns FR; Ziccardi VB; Buckley M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1996 May; 54(5):578-81; discussion 581-2. PubMed ID: 8632241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of propofol and methohexital continuous infusion techniques for conscious sedation.
    Johns FR; Sandler NA; Buckley MJ; Herlich A
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Oct; 56(10):1124-7; discussion 1127-8. PubMed ID: 9766535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An outcome study comparing intravenous sedation with midazolam/fentanyl (conscious sedation) versus propofol infusion (deep sedation) for aesthetic surgery.
    Hasen KV; Samartzis D; Casas LA; Mustoe TA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Nov; 112(6):1683-9; discussion 1690-1. PubMed ID: 14578803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing efficacy and safety of four intravenous sedation regimens in dental outpatients.
    Dionne RA; Yagiela JA; Moore PA; Gonty A; Zuniga J; Beirne OR
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Jun; 132(6):740-51. PubMed ID: 11433853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of recovery of propofol and methohexital sedation using an infusion pump.
    Cohen M; Eisig S; Kraut RA
    Anesth Prog; 1996; 43(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 10323119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Propofol: an alternative general anesthetic for outpatient oral surgery.
    Pastuovic MN; Cohen ME; Burton RG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1996 Aug; 54(8):943-8. PubMed ID: 8765382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of recovery in patients undergoing intravenous conscious sedation using bispectral analysis.
    Sandler NA; Hodges J; Sabino M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jun; 59(6):603-11; discussion 611-2. PubMed ID: 11381378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The cost-effectiveness of methohexital versus propofol for sedation during monitored anesthesia care.
    Sá Rêgo MM; Inagaki Y; White PF
    Anesth Analg; 1999 Apr; 88(4):723-8. PubMed ID: 10195511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anesthesiologist-controlled versus patient-controlled propofol sedation for shockwave lithotripsy.
    Alhashemi JA; Kaki AM
    Can J Anaesth; 2006 May; 53(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 16636028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multidrug intravenous sedation: determinants of the sedative dose of midazolam.
    Moore PA; Finder RL; Jackson DL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Jul; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9247941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam in outpatient third molar surgery.
    Ustün Y; Gündüz M; Erdoğan O; Benlidayi ME
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 64(9):1353-8. PubMed ID: 16916668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of propofol, midazolam, and methohexital for sedation during retrobulbar and peribulbar block.
    Ferrari LR; Donlon JV
    J Clin Anesth; 1992; 4(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 1562343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early cognitive impairment after sedation for colonoscopy: the effect of adding midazolam and/or fentanyl to propofol.
    Padmanabhan U; Leslie K; Eer AS; Maruff P; Silbert BS
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Nov; 109(5):1448-55. PubMed ID: 19617584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation, pain and hemodynamic control, during colonoscopy under conscious sedation.
    Dere K; Sucullu I; Budak ET; Yeyen S; Filiz AI; Ozkan S; Dagli G
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):648-52. PubMed ID: 20531094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficiency of propofol versus midazolam and fentanyl sedation at a pediatric teaching hospital: a prospective study.
    Lightdale JR; Valim C; Newburg AR; Mahoney LB; Zgleszewski S; Fox VL
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Jun; 67(7):1067-75. PubMed ID: 18367187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of deep sedation for electrophysiology procedures administered in the absence of an anesthetist.
    Geiger MJ; Wase A; Kearney MM; Brandon MJ; Kent V; Newby KH; Natale A
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul; 20(7):1808-14. PubMed ID: 9249836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved sedation for oral surgery by combining nitrous oxide and intravenous Midazolam: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Venchard GR; Thomson PJ; Boys R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jun; 35(6):522-7. PubMed ID: 16442264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intravenous sedation for implant surgery: midazolam, butorphanol, and dexmedetomidine versus midazolam, butorphanol, and propofol.
    Kawaai H; Tomita S; Nakaike Y; Ganzberg S; Yamazaki S
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Feb; 40(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 22206410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgeon-administered conscious sedation and local anesthesia for ambulatory anorectal surgery.
    Hina M; Hourigan JS; Moore RA; Stanley JD
    Am Surg; 2014 Jan; 80(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 24401505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safe and effective sedation in endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a randomized comparison between propofol continuous infusion and intermittent midazolam injection.
    Kiriyama S; Gotoda T; Sano H; Oda I; Nishimoto F; Hirashima T; Kusano C; Kuwano H
    J Gastroenterol; 2010 Aug; 45(8):831-7. PubMed ID: 20228999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.