251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8633139)
1. Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation.
Reinhold C; McCarthy S; Bret PM; Mehio A; Atri M; Zakarian R; Glaude Y; Liang L; Seymour RJ
Radiology; 1996 Apr; 199(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 8633139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diffuse uterine adenomyosis: morphologic criteria and diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal sonography.
Reinhold C; Atri M; Mehio A; Zakarian R; Aldis AE; Bret PM
Radiology; 1995 Dec; 197(3):609-14. PubMed ID: 7480727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adenomyosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging and transvaginal sonography.
Ascher SM; Arnold LL; Patt RH; Schruefer JJ; Bagley AS; Semelka RC; Zeman RK; Simon JA
Radiology; 1994 Mar; 190(3):803-6. PubMed ID: 8115630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis.
Dueholm M; Lundorf E; Hansen ES; Sørensen JS; Ledertoug S; Olesen F
Fertil Steril; 2001 Sep; 76(3):588-94. PubMed ID: 11532486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adenomyosis: three-dimensional sonographic findings of the junctional zone and correlation with histology.
Exacoustos C; Brienza L; Di Giovanni A; Szabolcs B; Romanini ME; Zupi E; Arduini D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Apr; 37(4):471-9. PubMed ID: 21433167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endovaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis uteri: identifying the predictive characteristics.
Brosens JJ; de Souza NM; Barker FG; Paraschos T; Winston RM
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Jun; 102(6):471-4. PubMed ID: 7632639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis of adenomyosis: histologic correlation with ultrasound targeted biopsies of the uterus.
Luciano DE; Exacoustos C; Albrecht L; LaMonica R; Proffer A; Zupi E; Luciano AA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 24183272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnosing adenomyosis with MRI: a prospective study revisiting the junctional zone thickness cutoff of 12 mm as a diagnostic marker.
Tellum T; Matic GV; Dormagen JB; Nygaard S; Viktil E; Qvigstad E; Lieng M
Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6971-6981. PubMed ID: 31264010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transvaginal ultrasound or MRI for diagnosis of adenomyosis.
Dueholm M; Lundorf E
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 19(6):505-12. PubMed ID: 18007126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology.
Bazot M; Cortez A; Darai E; Rouger J; Chopier J; Antoine JM; Uzan S
Hum Reprod; 2001 Nov; 16(11):2427-33. PubMed ID: 11679533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach.
Chapron C; Vannuccini S; Santulli P; Abrão MS; Carmona F; Fraser IS; Gordts S; Guo SW; Just PA; Noël JC; Pistofidis G; Van den Bosch T; Petraglia F
Hum Reprod Update; 2020 Apr; 26(3):392-411. PubMed ID: 32097456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adenomyosis: US features with histologic correlation in an in-vitro study.
Atri M; Reinhold C; Mehio AR; Chapman WB; Bret PM
Radiology; 2000 Jun; 215(3):783-90. PubMed ID: 10831700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transvaginal sonographic criteria for the diagnosis of adenomyosis based on histopathologic correlation.
Sun YL; Wang CB; Lee CY; Wun TH; Lin P; Lin YH; Tseng CC; Chen CH; Tseng CJ
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Mar; 49(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 20466291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spectrum of MR features in adenomyosis.
Tamai K; Koyama T; Umeoka S; Saga T; Fujii S; Togashi K
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 20(4):583-602. PubMed ID: 16564228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adnexal masses: comparison of specificity of endovaginal US and pelvic MR imaging.
Jain KA; Friedman DL; Pettinger TW; Alagappan R; Jeffrey RB; Sommer FG
Radiology; 1993 Mar; 186(3):697-704. PubMed ID: 8430177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Uterine adenomyosis in infertile patients: MR imaging findings and clinical conclusions].
Zangos S; Kissler S; Mueller A; Siebzehnruebl E; Kaufmann M; Hamscho N; Grünwald F; Eichler K; Herzog C; Marquardt F; Peters J; Jacobi V; Mack MG; Vogl TJ
Rofo; 2004 Nov; 176(11):1641-7. PubMed ID: 15497083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fast breath-hold T2-weighted MR imaging reduces interobserver variability in the diagnosis of adenomyosis.
Bazot M; Daraï E; Clément de Givry S; Boudghène F; Uzan S; Le Blanche AF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 May; 180(5):1291-6. PubMed ID: 12704040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MRI characteristics of the uterine junctional zone: from normal to the diagnosis of adenomyosis.
Novellas S; Chassang M; Delotte J; Toullalan O; Chevallier A; Bouaziz J; Chevallier P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 May; 196(5):1206-13. PubMed ID: 21512093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laser ablation of the endometrium: MR appearance during and after treatment and the relation of MR appearance to clinical outcome.
deSouza NM; McMillan DL; Puni RK; Coutts GA; Hall AS; Harris DN; Young IR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1121-6. PubMed ID: 8911162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adenomyosis: specificity of 5 mm as the maximum normal uterine junctional zone thickness in MR images.
Kang S; Turner DA; Foster GS; Rapoport MI; Spencer SA; Wang JZ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1145-50. PubMed ID: 8615259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
