These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8633153)
1. Mottle on computed radiographs of the chest in pediatric patients. Huda W; Slone RM; Belden CJ; Williams JL; Cumming WA; Palmer CK Radiology; 1996 Apr; 199(1):249-52. PubMed ID: 8633153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of doses for bedside examinations of the chest with conventional screen-film and computed radiography: results of a randomized controlled trial. Weatherburn GC; Bryan S; Davies JG Radiology; 2000 Dec; 217(3):707-12. PubMed ID: 11110932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom. Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Low-dose digital computed radiography in pediatric chest imaging. Kogutt MS; Jones JP; Perkins DD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):775-9. PubMed ID: 3262278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs. Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems. Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of monitoring materials on bedside chest radiographs with the most recent generation of storage phosphor plates: dose increase does not improve detection performance. Eisenhuber E; Stadler A; Prokop M; Fuchsjager M; Weber M; Schaefer-Prokop C Radiology; 2003 Apr; 227(1):216-21. PubMed ID: 12668747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique. MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of bedside chest hard-copy screen-film versus hard- and soft-copy computed radiographs in a medical intensive care unit: receiver operating characteristic analysis. Kundel HL; Gefter W; Aronchick J; Miller W; Hatabu H; Whitfill CH; Miller W Radiology; 1997 Dec; 205(3):859-63. PubMed ID: 9393548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital imaging with a photostimulable phosphor in the chest of newborns. Cohen MD; Katz BP; Kalasinski LA; White SJ; Smith JA; Long B Radiology; 1991 Dec; 181(3):829-32. PubMed ID: 1947105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a new phosphor plate technology for neonatal portable chest radiographs. Cohen M; Corea D; Wanner M; Karmazyn B; Gunderman R; Applegate K; Jennings SG Acad Radiol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):197-8. PubMed ID: 21232684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography. Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations. Andriole KP J Digit Imaging; 2002 Sep; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 12532253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography. Huda W Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new asymmetric screen-film combination for conventional chest radiography: evaluation in 50 patients. Swensen SJ; Gray JE; Brown LR; Aughenbaugh GL; Harms GF; Stears J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):483-6. PubMed ID: 8430540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Photostimulation plates or conventional films for bedside chest x-ray in pediatric radiology? A comparative study of quality of image and the dose delivered to patients]. Maccia C; Docou le Pointe H; Fery-Lemonnier E; Nadeau X; Montagne JP; Charpentier E; Ariche-Cohen M; Viens-Bitker C J Radiol; 1996 Nov; 77(11):1129-34. PubMed ID: 9033870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [High intensification film-screen systems in thoracic diagnosis. A clinical comparative study]. Schäfer CB; Sokiranski R; Claussen CD Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 8580141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose. Ramli K; Abdullah BJ; Ng KH; Mahmud R; Hussain AF Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]