BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8634192)

  • 1. Microleakage and marginal gap formation of glass ionomer resin restorations.
    Salama FS; Riad MI; Abdel Megid FY
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 20(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 8634192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide.
    Moosavi H; Ghavamnasiri M; Manari V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20020076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
    Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reducing microleakage in Class II restorations: an in vitro study.
    Crim GA; Chapman KW
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Nov; 25(11):781-5. PubMed ID: 7568683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resin-modified glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: a comparison of three in vitro procedures.
    al-Obaidi FF; Salama FS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1996; 21(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 9161211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage of resin composite restorations with glass-ceramic inserts.
    Olmez A; Oztaş N; Bilici S
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Nov; 29(11):725-9. PubMed ID: 10200722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage of Class V restorations using two different compomer systems: an in vitro study.
    Estafan D; Pines MS; Erakin C; Fuerst PF
    J Clin Dent; 1999; 10(4):124-6. PubMed ID: 10825860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass ionomer.
    Sidhu SK; Henderson LJ
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1437685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage of Class V composite, resin sandwich, and resin-modified glass ionomers.
    Trushkowsky RD; Gwinnett AJ
    Am J Dent; 1996 Jun; 9(3):96-9. PubMed ID: 9002797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of microleakage among three different glass ionomer types.
    Abd El Halim S; Zaki D
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 21488727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of laser pretreated enamel and dentin of primary teeth on microleakage of different restorative materials.
    Salama FS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 9796497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal contraction gap formation of light-cured glass ionomers.
    Sidhu SK
    Am J Dent; 1994 Apr; 7(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 8054184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of desiccation on microleakage of five Class 5 restorative materials.
    Bouschlicher MR; Vargas MA; Denehy GE
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):90-5. PubMed ID: 9002867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage of composite resin restorations with various etching times.
    Gilpatrick RO; Kaplan I; Roach D
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Aug; 25(8):573-6. PubMed ID: 7568707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage of a new improved glass ionomer restorative material in primary and permanent teeth.
    Castro A; Feigal RE
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 11874054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal adaptation of resin-bonded light-cured glass ionomers in dentin cavities.
    Fritz UB; Finger WJ; Uno S
    Am J Dent; 1996 Dec; 9(6):253-8. PubMed ID: 9545879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations.
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Mortazavi F
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9227124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.