These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8634732)

  • 1. Improving participation and interrater agreement in scoring Ambulatory Pediatric Association abstracts. How well have we succeeded?
    Kemper KJ; McCarthy PL; Cicchetti DV
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 1996 Apr; 150(4):380-3. PubMed ID: 8634732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of a structured method of selecting abstracts for a plastic surgical scientific meeting.
    van der Steen LP; Hage JJ; Kon M; Mazzola R
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Jun; 111(7):2215-22. PubMed ID: 12794462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reviewer agreement in scoring 419 abstracts for scientific orthopedics meetings.
    Poolman RW; Keijser LC; de Waal Malefijt MC; Blankevoort L; Farrokhyar F; Bhandari M;
    Acta Orthop; 2007 Apr; 78(2):278-84. PubMed ID: 17464619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inter-rater agreement in the scoring of abstracts submitted to a primary care research conference.
    Montgomery AA; Graham A; Evans PH; Fahey T
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2002 Mar; 2(1):8. PubMed ID: 11914164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How reliable is peer review of scientific abstracts? Looking back at the 1991 Annual Meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine.
    Rubin HR; Redelmeier DA; Wu AW; Steinberg EP
    J Gen Intern Med; 1993 May; 8(5):255-8. PubMed ID: 8505684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience. Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone?
    Rothwell PM; Martyn CN
    Brain; 2000 Sep; 123 ( Pt 9)():1964-9. PubMed ID: 10960059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interrater reliability in grading abstracts for the orthopaedic trauma association.
    Bhandari M; Templeman D; Tornetta P
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Jun; (423):217-21. PubMed ID: 15232452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inferior reliability of VAS scoring compared with International Society of the Knee reporting system for abstract assessment.
    Rahbek O; Jensen SL; Lind M; Penny JØ; Kallemose T; Jakobsen T; Troelsen A
    Dan Med J; 2017 Apr; 64(4):. PubMed ID: 28385168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer Review Interrater Reliability of Scientific Abstracts: A Study of an Anesthesia Subspecialty Society.
    Cohen IT; Patel K
    J Educ Perioper Med; 2005; 7(2):E035. PubMed ID: 27175428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reviewer agreement trends from four years of electronic submissions of conference abstract.
    Rowe BH; Strome TL; Spooner C; Blitz S; Grafstein E; Worster A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Mar; 6():14. PubMed ID: 16545143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [How are the abstracts reviewed and submitted to the French Pediatric Society?].
    Hankard R; Giraudeau B; Dubus JC; Tounian P; Sarles J; Chabrol B; Chantepie A
    Arch Pediatr; 2011 Dec; 18(12):1257-60. PubMed ID: 22041591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abstract scoring for the annual SMR program: significance of reviewer score normalization.
    Glover GH; Henkelman RM
    Magn Reson Med; 1994 Oct; 32(4):435-9. PubMed ID: 7997106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pediatric cardiology research in 1990: a review of abstracts submitted to the Society for Pediatric Research, American Academy of Pediatrics, and American Heart Association Scientific Sessions.
    Gidding SS; Benson DW; Clark EB; Rocchini AP
    Pediatr Res; 1992 Jul; 32(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 1635833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Publication of research presented at the pediatric meetings. Change in selection.
    McCormick MC; Holmes JH
    Am J Dis Child; 1985 Feb; 139(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 3976583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How the ESPU grades clinical abstracts.
    Kaefer M; Beckers G; Gobet R; El-Ghoneimi A; Fossum M;
    J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Oct; 14(5):451-452. PubMed ID: 30181100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of abstracts submitted to the annual scientific meeting of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists.
    Bydder S; Marion K; Taylor M; Semmens J
    Australas Radiol; 2006 Aug; 50(4):355-9. PubMed ID: 16884423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. From the History of the Croatian Dermatovenereological Society - The Croatian Medical Association and an Overview of Important Information Regarding the Journal Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica.
    Dobrić I
    Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2018 Dec; 26(4):344-348. PubMed ID: 30665489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of abstracts in 3 clinical dermatology journals.
    Dupuy A; Khosrotehrani K; Lebbé C; Rybojad M; Morel P
    Arch Dermatol; 2003 May; 139(5):589-93. PubMed ID: 12756095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An Analysis of Factors Predicting Successful Transition From Pancreatology Abstracts to Full Publications.
    Grunwald D; Feuerstein JD; Maier IM; Sheth SG
    Pancreas; 2017 Jan; 46(1):131-134. PubMed ID: 27846141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Completion publication of abstracts presented at the scientific meetings of the Pan-African Pediatric Surgical Association.
    Nasir AA; Ameh EA; Poenaru D
    Afr J Paediatr Surg; 2013; 10(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 24192469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.