BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8635061)

  • 61. Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years.
    Buist DS; Porter PL; Lehman C; Taplin SH; White E
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Oct; 96(19):1432-40. PubMed ID: 15467032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Palpable presentation of breast cancer persists in the era of screening mammography.
    Mathis KL; Hoskin TL; Boughey JC; Crownhart BS; Brandt KR; Vachon CM; Grant CS; Degnim AC
    J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Mar; 210(3):314-8. PubMed ID: 20193894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Breast cancer survival rates with mammographic screening: similar favorable survival rates for women younger and those older than 50 years.
    Thurfjell EL; Lindgren JA
    Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):421-6. PubMed ID: 8888234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Clinical efficacy of mammographic screening in the elderly.
    Faulk RM; Sickles EA; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB; Frankel SD
    Radiology; 1995 Jan; 194(1):193-7. PubMed ID: 7997552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Surveillance of women at increased risk of breast cancer using mammography and clinical breast examination: further evidence of benefit.
    Maurice A; Evans DG; Affen J; Greenhalgh R; Duffy SW; Howell A
    Int J Cancer; 2012 Jul; 131(2):417-25. PubMed ID: 21898384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Is breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) useful for diagnosis of additional sites of disease in patients recently diagnosed with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)?
    Benveniste AP; Ortiz-Perez T; Ebuoma LO; Sepulveda KA; Severs FJ; Roark A; Wang T; Sedgwick EL
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Nov; 96():74-79. PubMed ID: 29103479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Relationship of clinical and pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and outcome of locally advanced breast cancer.
    Gajdos C; Tartter PI; Estabrook A; Gistrak MA; Jaffer S; Bleiweiss IJ
    J Surg Oncol; 2002 May; 80(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 11967899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Predictors of surveillance mammography outcomes in women with a personal history of breast cancer.
    Lowry KP; Braunstein LZ; Economopoulos KP; Salama L; Lehman CD; Gazelle GS; Halpern EF; Giess CS; Taghian AG; Lee JM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Aug; 171(1):209-215. PubMed ID: 29748762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Do mammographic tumor features in breast cancer relate to breast density and invasiveness, tumor size, and axillary lymph node involvement?
    Sartor H; Borgquist S; Hartman L; Olsson Å; Jawdat F; Zackrisson S
    Acta Radiol; 2015 May; 56(5):536-44. PubMed ID: 24814360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Predictive factors for sentinel node metastases in primary invasive breast cancer: a population-based cohort study of 2552 consecutive patients.
    Majid S; Rydén L; Manjer J
    World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Mar; 16(1):54. PubMed ID: 29530065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The benefits of mammography are not limited to women of ages older than 50 years.
    Heimann R; Bradley J; Hellman S
    Cancer; 1998 Jun; 82(11):2221-6. PubMed ID: 9610702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Age-dependent growth rate of primary breast cancer.
    Peer PG; van Dijck JA; Hendriks JH; Holland R; Verbeek AL
    Cancer; 1993 Jun; 71(11):3547-51. PubMed ID: 8490903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Breast cancer in young women.
    Gillett D; Kennedy C; Carmalt H
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1997 Nov; 67(11):761-4. PubMed ID: 9396990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Patterns of breast cancer detection in the United States.
    Nemoto T; Natarajan N; Smart CR; Mettlin C; Murphy GP
    J Surg Oncol; 1982 Nov; 21(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 6290791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. [Diagnosis of breast cancer in women age 40 and younger: mammography and breast ultrasound].
    Milosević Z; Karapandzić VP; Jovićević A; Vuković V; Vucićević J; Pavlović T; Borojević N
    Acta Chir Iugosl; 2009; 56(4):77-81. PubMed ID: 20420001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Insights into breast cancer screening of younger women. Evidence from the 14-year follow-up of the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project.
    Smart CR; Hartmann WH; Beahrs OH; Garfinkel L
    Cancer; 1993 Aug; 72(4 Suppl):1449-56. PubMed ID: 8339237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Implications of pathologist concordance for breast cancer assessments in mammography screening from age 40 years.
    Anderson TJ; Sufi F; Ellis IO; Sloane JP; Moss S
    Hum Pathol; 2002 Mar; 33(3):365-71. PubMed ID: 11979379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Impact of breast cancer family history on tumor detection and tumor size in women newly-diagnosed with invasive breast cancer.
    Schwab FD; Bürki N; Huang DJ; Heinzelmann-Schwarz V; Schmid SM; Vetter M; Schötzau A; Güth U
    Fam Cancer; 2014 Mar; 13(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 24002368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Metamorphosis of breast cancer.
    Egan RL
    South Med J; 1978 Nov; 71(11):1325-30. PubMed ID: 715480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Screening mammography in British Columbia: 1988-1993.
    Clay MG; Hislop TG; Kan L; Olivotto IA; Burhenne LJ
    Am J Surg; 1994 May; 167(5):490-2. PubMed ID: 8185033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.