These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Should a hand-carried ultrasound machine become standard equipment for every internist? Alpert JS; Mladenovic J; Hellmann DB Am J Med; 2009 Jan; 122(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 19114160 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Overview of high-risk medical device recalls in obstetrics and gynecology from 2002 through 2016: implications for device safety. Janetos TM; Ghobadi CW; Xu S; Walter JR Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):42-46.e1. PubMed ID: 28500861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a hydrogen peroxide-based system for high-level disinfection of vaginal ultrasound probes. Johnson S; Proctor M; Bluth E; Smetherman D; Baumgarten K; Troxclair L; Bienvenu M J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Oct; 32(10):1799-804. PubMed ID: 24065261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Ultrasound experience and apparatus of Swiss gynecologists. Results of a written survey]. Zimmerman R; Vial Y Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1996; 259 Suppl 1():S111-7. PubMed ID: 9133263 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. How to diagnose ultrasound transducer problems. Phillips W Biomed Instrum Technol; 1999; 33(3):234-8. PubMed ID: 10360212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Hygiene in endovaginal gynecologic and obstetrical ultrasound in 2008]. Chalouhi GE; Salomon LJ; Marelle P; Bernard JP; Ville Y J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2009 Feb; 38(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 19081685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new three-dimensional automatic bodymarker system for transvaginal ultrasonography. Kuwata T; Taniguchi N; Matsubara S; Ono T; Itoh K; Suzuki M Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 25(6):586-91. PubMed ID: 15942923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sound decisions. A guide to selecting ultrasound equipment. Health Devices; 2011 Aug; 40(8):248-57. PubMed ID: 23444530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The problems in the ultrasonography and its countermeasure]. Higashi Y Rinsho Hoshasen; 1990 Oct; 35(11):1355-61. PubMed ID: 2277416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasound machine comparison: an evaluation of ergonomic design, data management, ease of use, and image quality. Wynd KP; Smith HM; Jacob AK; Torsher LC; Kopp SL; Hebl JR Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2009; 34(4):349-56. PubMed ID: 19574868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Evaluation of a new, portable ultrasound system in routine clinical use]. Pieckenpack A; Klebl F; Dorenbeck U; Schölmerich J; Lock G; Schlottmann K Rofo; 2002 Mar; 174(3):349-52. PubMed ID: 11885014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]