87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8635399)
21. A prospective pediatric clinical trial of digital music players: do they interfere with pacemakers?
Chiu CC; Huh J; De Souza L; Alfaro-Ramirez A; Clegg R; Fenwick L; Hamilton RM; Kirsh JA; Gross GJ; Gao D; Stephenson EA
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2009 Jan; 20(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 18691233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical benefits of remote versus transtelephonic monitoring of implanted pacemakers.
Crossley GH; Chen J; Choucair W; Cohen TJ; Gohn DC; Johnson WB; Kennedy EE; Mongeon LR; Serwer GA; Qiao H; Wilkoff BL;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 54(22):2012-9. PubMed ID: 19926006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Electromagnetic interference with pacemakers caused by portable media players.
Thaker JP; Patel MB; Jongnarangsin K; Liepa VV; Thakur RK
Heart Rhythm; 2008 Apr; 5(4):538-44. PubMed ID: 18329961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Strategy for safe performance of extrathoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 tesla in the presence of cardiac pacemakers in non-pacemaker-dependent patients: a prospective study with 115 examinations.
Sommer T; Naehle CP; Yang A; Zeijlemaker V; Hackenbroch M; Schmiedel A; Meyer C; Strach K; Skowasch D; Vahlhaus C; Litt H; Schild H
Circulation; 2006 Sep; 114(12):1285-92. PubMed ID: 16966587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Do European GSM mobile cellular phones pose a potential risk to pacemaker patients?
Barbaro V; Bartolini P; Donato A; Militello C; Altamura G; Ammirati F; Santini M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jun; 18(6):1218-24. PubMed ID: 7659575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Interference between mobile phones and pacemakers: a look inside.
Censi F; Calcagnini G; Triventi M; Mattei E; Bartolini P
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2007; 43(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 17938456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [In vitro and in vivo study of electromagnetic compatibility of cellular phones and pacemakers].
Gellér L; Thuróczy G; Merkely B
Orv Hetil; 2001 Sep; 142(36):1963-70. PubMed ID: 11680101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Use of dual-chamber pacemaker. Short and long-term results].
Dubernet J; Fajuri A; Acevedo M; González JA; Maturana G; Zalaquett R; Garrido L; De la Paz F; Casanegra P
Rev Med Chil; 1999 Mar; 127(3):309-18. PubMed ID: 10436715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of electromagnetic interference of GSM mobile phones with pacemakers featuring remote monitoring functions.
Calcagnini G; Censi F; Floris M; Pignalberi C; Ricci R; Biancalana G; Bartolini P; Santini M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Apr; 29(4):380-5. PubMed ID: 16650266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Third-generation mobile phones (UMTS) do not interfere with permanent implanted pacemakers.
Ismail MM; Badreldin AM; Heldwein M; Hekmat K
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2010 Jul; 33(7):860-4. PubMed ID: 20180913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of D-net (EUROPEAN GSM-standard) cellular telephones on implanted pacemakers in children.
Elshershari H; Celiker A; Ozer S; Ozme S
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2002 Sep; 25(9):1328-30. PubMed ID: 12380768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Proarrhythmic effect of pacemaker stimulation in patients with implanted cardioverter-defibrillators.
Himmrich E; Przibille O; Zellerhoff C; Liebrich A; Rosocha S; Andreas K; Nebeling D; Omogbehin B; Meyer J
Circulation; 2003 Jul; 108(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 12835212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Management of far-field R wave sensing for the avoidance of inappropriate mode switch in dual chamber pacemakers: results of the FFS-test study.
Kolb C; Wille B; Maurer D; Schuchert A; Weber R; Schibgilla V; Klein N; Hümmer A; Schmitt C; Zrenner B;
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Sep; 17(9):992-7. PubMed ID: 16948743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Electromagnetic interference of external pacemakers by walkie-talkies and digital cellular phones: experimental study.
Trigano AJ; Azoulay A; Rochdi M; Campillo A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Apr; 22(4 Pt 1):588-93. PubMed ID: 10234711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A prospective trial of new versus refurbished cardiac pacemakers: a Canadian experience.
Rosengarten M; Chiu R; Hoffman R
Can J Cardiol; 1989 Apr; 5(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 2655847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical study of interference with cardiac pacemakers by a magnetic field at power line frequencies.
Trigano A; Blandeau O; Souques M; Gernez JP; Magne I
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Mar; 45(6):896-900. PubMed ID: 15766826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Critical comparison of uni- and bipolar pacemaker systems].
Alt E
Z Kardiol; 1987 Apr; 76(4):189-94. PubMed ID: 3604370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Electromagnetic interference with implantable cardiac pacemakers by video capsule.
Dubner S; Dubner Y; Gallino S; Spallone L; Zagalsky D; Rubio H; Zimmerman J; Goldin E
Gastrointest Endosc; 2005 Feb; 61(2):250-4. PubMed ID: 15729234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Atrial natriuretic peptide for monitoring cardiovascular system performance following pacemaker implantation.
Sielski J; Janion M; Gawor Z
Kardiol Pol; 2005 Mar; 62(3):202-9; discussion 210. PubMed ID: 15830014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of D-net (European GSM-Standard) cellular phones on pacemaker function in 50 patients with permanent pacemakers.
Wilke A; Grimm W; Funck R; Maisch B
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Oct; 19(10):1456-8. PubMed ID: 8904536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
