These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8636619)
21. Predicting neonatal weight of more than 4000 g using fetal abdominal circumference measurement by ultrasound at 38-40 weeks of pregnancy: a study in Iran. Dadkhah F; Kashanian M; Bonyad Z; Larijani T J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Jan; 39(1):170-4. PubMed ID: 22690747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Usefulness of ultrasound fetal anthropometry in primary and secondary screening to identify small for gestational age: A meta-analysis. Goto E J Clin Ultrasound; 2019 May; 47(4):212-218. PubMed ID: 30635918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fetal abdominal circumference measurements of 35 and 38 cm as predictors of macrosomia. A risk factor for shoulder dystocia. Gilby JR; Williams MC; Spellacy WN J Reprod Med; 2000 Nov; 45(11):936-8. PubMed ID: 11127108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Longitudinal fetal biometry of normal pregnant Melanesian Papua New Guineans to construct standards of reference for Papua New Guinea. Amoa AB; Wapi J; Klufio CA P N G Med J; 1993 Sep; 36(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 8059548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sonographic diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) by fetal transverse cerebellar diameter (TCD)/abdominal circumference (AC) ratio. Tongsong T; Wanapirak C; Thongpadungroj T Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1999 Jul; 66(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 10458543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Estimation of fetal weight: reference range at 20-36 weeks' gestation and comparison with actual birth-weight reference range. Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Ville Y Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):550-5. PubMed ID: 17444561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fetal biometry charts for normal pregnant women in northeastern Thailand. Saksiriwuttho P; Ratanasiri T; Komwilaisak R J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Oct; 90(10):1963-9. PubMed ID: 18041409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Customizing fetal biometric charts. Pang MW; Leung TN; Sahota DS; Lau TK; Chang AM Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Sep; 22(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 12942500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Ratios between the abdominal circumference, head circumference, or femur length and the transverse cerebellar diameter of the growth-retarded and macrosomic fetus. Hill LM; Guzick D; DiNofrio D; Maloney J; Merolillo C; Nedzesky P Am J Perinatol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 8198657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Prevention of shoulder dystocia by an ultrasound selection at the beginning of labour of foetuses with large abdominal circumference]. Maticot-Baptista D; Collin A; Martin A; Maillet R; Riethmuller D J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2007 Feb; 36(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 17293252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Growth retardation in fetuses with gastroschisis. Raynor BD; Richards D J Ultrasound Med; 1997 Jan; 16(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 8979221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ultrasonic diagnosis of altered fetal growth by use of a normal ultrasonic fetal weight curve. Ott WJ; Doyle S Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Feb; 63(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 6694813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry. Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Duyme M; Buvat I; Ville Y Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 25(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 15909324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ultrasound measurement of fetal abdominal circumference and the ratio of biparietal diameter to transverse abdominal diameter in a mixed Nigerian population. Okonofua FE; Ayangade SO; Ajibulu OA Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1988 Aug; 27(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 2905282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Suspicion of intrauterine growth restriction: Use of abdominal circumference alone or estimated fetal weight below 10%. Chauhan SP; Cole J; Sanderson M; Magann EF; Scardo JA J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Sep; 19(9):557-62. PubMed ID: 16966124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Intrapartum prediction of macrosomia: accuracy of abdominal circumference estimation. Al-Inany H; Alaa N; Momtaz M; Abdel Badii M Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2001; 51(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 11223705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The sonographic assessment of twin growth discordancy. Hill LM; Guzick D; Chenevey P; Boyles D; Nedzesky P Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):501-4. PubMed ID: 8090383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]