These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
63. Human reproductive technologies and the law: a select committee report. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee Bull Med Ethics; 2005 May; (208):13-21. PubMed ID: 17115496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. The law and assisted reproduction in the United Kingdom and United States. Stenger RL J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(1):135-61. PubMed ID: 11654454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1995 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertil Steril; 1998 Mar; 69(3):389-98. PubMed ID: 9531864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. [Male sterility factor and current methods in reproduction medicine]. Sudik R Zentralbl Gynakol; 1991; 113(7):359-65. PubMed ID: 2063629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. The investigation of idiopathic infertility by in vitro fertilization. Trounson AO; Leeton JF; Wood C; Webb J; Kovacs G Fertil Steril; 1980 Nov; 34(5):431-8. PubMed ID: 7439409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Contribution of the assisted reproductive technologies to fertility in males suffering spinal cord injury. Taylor Z; Molloy D; Hill V; Harrison K Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Feb; 39(1):84-7. PubMed ID: 10099757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Failures (with some successes) of assisted reproduction and gamete donation programs. ESHRE Capri Workshop Group Hum Reprod Update; 2013; 19(4):354-65. PubMed ID: 23459992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Survey of attitudes regarding the use of siblings for gamete donation. Sauer MV; Rodi IA; Scrooc M; Bustillo M; Buster JE Fertil Steril; 1988 Apr; 49(4):721-2. PubMed ID: 3350167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Evolving patterns of iatrogenic multifetal pregnancy generation: implications for aggressiveness of infertility treatments. Evans MI; Littmann L; St Louis L; LeBlanc L; Addis J; Johnson MP; Moghissi KS Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1750-3; discussion 1753-5. PubMed ID: 7778628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Families created by the new reproductive technologies: quality of parenting and social and emotional development of the children. Golombok S; Cook R; Bish A; Murray C Child Dev; 1995 Apr; 66(2):285-98. PubMed ID: 7750366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Modern approaches to the treatment of human infertility through assisted reproduction. Fernández Pelegrina R; Kessler AG; Rawlins RG P R Health Sci J; 1991 Aug; 10(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 1946922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. A Catholic ethical approach to human reproductive technology. Ford NM Reprod Biomed Online; 2008; 17 Suppl 3():39-48. PubMed ID: 18983736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Differences in the attitudes of couples whose children were conceived through artificial insemination by donor in 1980 and in 1996. van Berkel D; van der Veen L; Kimmel I; te Velde E Fertil Steril; 1999 Feb; 71(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 9988389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Artificial insemination homologous and its role in the management of infertility. Steiman RP; Taymor ML Fertil Steril; 1977 Feb; 28(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 832725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]