146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8637495)
1. Mandates for unproven health care interventions.
Gervais KG; Priester R
Minn Med; 1996 Apr; 79(4):52-5. PubMed ID: 8637495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Mandated benefits. Issue brief.
Miller KG
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2010 Jan; ():1-28. PubMed ID: 20217929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Do the right thing: Minnesota's HealthRight Program.
Caplan AL; Ogren PA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(5):4-5. PubMed ID: 1428837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Virginia okays coverage for experimental cancer coverage.
Tokarski C
J Am Health Policy; 1994; 4(3):57-8. PubMed ID: 10134327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Mandated benefits. Issue brief.
Miller KG
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2009 Jan; ():1-24. PubMed ID: 19297703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Setting a national minimum standard for health benefits: how do state benefit mandates compare with benefits in large-group plans?
Frey A; Mika S; Nuzum R; Schoen C
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund); 2009 Jun; 56():1-7. PubMed ID: 19582960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minnesota takes first steps toward universal health plan.
Perlstein S
J Am Health Policy; 1993; 3(2):63-4. PubMed ID: 10126985
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Questions shroud Minn. medical networks.
Kenkel PJ
Mod Healthc; 1993 May; 23(21):12. PubMed ID: 10125911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Mandated benefits. Year end issue brief.
Tiffany S
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2008 Jan; ():1-26. PubMed ID: 18345572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments.
Henne MB; Bundorf MK
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 17482603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. States may yet regret their many mandates.
Carroll J
Manag Care; 2011 Mar; 20(3):4-5. PubMed ID: 21485623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Last chance therapies and managed care. Pluralism, fair procedures, and legitimacy.
Daniels N; Sabin JE
Hastings Cent Rep; 1998; 28(2):27-41. PubMed ID: 9589291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Essentially astute ... but experts say benefit flexibility may cause trouble.
Daly R
Mod Healthc; 2012 Jan; 42(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 22359766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Perspectives. Minnesota aims for health care utopia.
Perlstein S
Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1992 Aug; 46(32):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10119448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of coverage and mandatory benefits requirements to ERISA health benefits plans.
Dechene JC
J Health Hosp Law; 1988 Dec; 21(12):321-6. PubMed ID: 10290864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Can "barebones" insurance replace state health mandates?
Margolis RE
Healthspan; 1991 Oct; 8(9):13-4. PubMed ID: 10115080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Small employers and benefit mandates.
Thompson R
Bus Health; 1990 Aug; 8(8):52-3. PubMed ID: 10105876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Consider it done? The likely efficacy of mandates for health insurance.
Glied SA; Hartz J; Giorgi G
Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(6):1612-21. PubMed ID: 17978381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. State laws have big impact on benefits: Minnesota Solons considering nearly 50 bills.
Spencer BF
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1975 Jun; 29(12):22, 24, 26. PubMed ID: 10277971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. State legislative focus: California, Florida, Minnesota.
Dauner CD; Glatfelter R; Solomon CM
Health Syst Rev; 1992; 25(5):11-6. PubMed ID: 10121079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
