These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 863756)

  • 1. [Acoustic and phoniatric investigations in esophageal speech (author's transl)].
    Sáfrán A; Orawetz O; Martikány I
    HNO; 1977 Apr; 25(4):137-9. PubMed ID: 863756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Discrimination and critical signal to noise ratio of normal and pathological hearing (author's transl)].
    von Wedel H
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1977 Feb; 56(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 139521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Analysis of qualitative voice and speech quality judgments after total laryngectomy].
    Miani C; Bertino G; Bellomo A; Staffieri A
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1998 Jun; 18(3):143-7. PubMed ID: 9926447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Directional hearing and understanding of speech in noise uith "normal hearing" people (author's transl)].
    Platte HJ; Döring WH; Schlöndorff G
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1978 Jul; 57(7):672-80. PubMed ID: 682785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Voice and speech after laryngectomy.
    Stajner-Katusić S; Horga D; Musura M; Globlek D
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):195-203. PubMed ID: 16428237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intelligibility characteristics of superior esophageal speech presented under various levels of masking noise.
    Horii Y; Weinberg B
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Sep; 18(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 1186150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Speech audiometry with sentences and noise (author's transl)].
    Schultz-Coulon HJ
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1974 Oct; 53(10):734-49. PubMed ID: 4444388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Speech discrimination in prescence of noise in different kinds of hearing loss (author's transl)].
    Hahn R
    Audiology; 1974; 13(6):485-9. PubMed ID: 4410930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perception of stop consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers.
    Gomyo Y; Doyle PC
    J Otolaryngol; 1989 Jun; 18(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 2739001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship of acoustic parameters and perceptual ratings of esophageal speech.
    Filter MD; Hyman M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Feb; 40(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 1118291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparative studies of the quality of the esophageal voice following laryngectomy: the insufflation test and reverse speech audiometry].
    Böhme G; Clasen B
    HNO; 1989 Sep; 37(9):358-64. PubMed ID: 2808010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Investigations to monaural and binaural time resolution of short interruptions within a defined signal (author's transl)].
    von Wedel H
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1976 Sep; 55(9):748-55. PubMed ID: 135904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6: normative and comparative intelligibility functions.
    Wilson RH; Coley KE; Haenel JL; Browning KM
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 1(5):221-8. PubMed ID: 956010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [How good is the esophageal voice?].
    Brusis T; Schöning A
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1984 Nov; 63(11):585-8. PubMed ID: 6521588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of speech detection and spondee thresholds and half- versus full-list intelligibility scores with MLV and taped presentations of NU-6.
    Beattie RC; Svihovec DA; Edgerton BJ
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(6):267-72. PubMed ID: 681199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech rehabilitation of a laryngectomized-glossectomized patient.
    Anderson JD; Thomas S
    Laryngoscope; 1978 Oct; 88(10):1666-70. PubMed ID: 703459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Influence of disturbing noise on sentence intelligibility (author's transl)].
    Welzl-Müller K
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1981 Mar; 60(3):117-20. PubMed ID: 7230993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Speech intelligibility after laryngectomy].
    Novák A
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1980 Dec; 29(6):339-44. PubMed ID: 7471262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speaking proficiency variations according to method of alaryngeal voicing.
    Williams SE; Watson JB
    Laryngoscope; 1987 Jun; 97(6):737-9. PubMed ID: 3586817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.