91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8638312)
1. [Chlamydia trachomatis].
Ottesen M
Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Feb; 158(6):751-5. PubMed ID: 8638312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnant women in the county of Vestsjaelland. Prevalence, prevention of perinatal transmission and cost-effectiveness of screening].
Ottesen M; Sahl I; Herbstman MM; Friis HM; Philipsen T
Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Feb; 158(6):756-8. PubMed ID: 8638313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Births and ectopic pregnancies in a large cohort of women tested for Chlamydia trachomatis.
Bakken IJ; Skjeldestad FE; Lydersen S; Nordbø SA
Sex Transm Dis; 2007 Oct; 34(10):739-43. PubMed ID: 17479068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk assessment and other screening options for gonorrhoea and chlamydial infections in women attending rural Tanzanian antenatal clinics.
Mayaud P; Grosskurth H; Changalucha J; Todd J; West B; Gabone R; Senkoro K; Rusizoka M; Laga M; Hayes R
Bull World Health Organ; 1995; 73(5):621-30. PubMed ID: 8846488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The program cost and cost-effectiveness of screening men for Chlamydia to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease in women.
Gift TL; Gaydos CA; Kent CK; Marrazzo JM; Rietmeijer CA; Schillinger JA; Dunne EF
Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Nov; 35(11 Suppl):S66-75. PubMed ID: 18830137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prevalence and risk factors for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnant women.
Kadzhaia D; Merabishvili N
Georgian Med News; 2005 Dec; (129):33-6. PubMed ID: 16444025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis among the sexually active population of Amsterdam. Il Over 90% participation and almost 5% prevalence].
van den Hoek JA; Mulder-Folkerts DK; Coutinho RA; Dukers NH; Buimer M; van Doornum GJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):668-72. PubMed ID: 10321299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women].
Postma MJ; Welte R; van den Hoek JA; van Doornum GJ; Coutinho RA; Jager JC
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):677-81. PubMed ID: 10321301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An evaluation of economics and acceptability of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection, in women attending antenatal, abortion, colposcopy and family planning clinics in Scotland, UK.
Norman JE; Wu O; Twaddle S; Macmillan S; McMillan L; Templeton A; McKenzie H; Noone A; Allardice G; Reid M
BJOG; 2004 Nov; 111(11):1261-8. PubMed ID: 15521872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Chlamydia trachomatis and ectopic pregnancy: recent epidemiological findings.
Bakken IJ
Curr Opin Infect Dis; 2008 Feb; 21(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 18192790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 2. Screening for chlamydial infections. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.
Davies HD; Wang EE
CMAJ; 1996 Jun; 154(11):1631-44. PubMed ID: 8646651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Lack of evidence to support chlamydia infection screening].
Andersen B; Østergaard L; Olesen F
Ugeskr Laeger; 2010 Jul; 172(28):2059-61. PubMed ID: 20615375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae genital infections in a publicly funded pregnancy termination clinic: empiric vs. indicated treatment?
Patel A; Rashid S; Godfrey EM; Panchal H
Contraception; 2008 Oct; 78(4):328-31. PubMed ID: 18847583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Screening for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnancy; cost-effectiveness favorable at a minimum prevalence rate of 3% or more].
Postma MJ; Bakker A; Welte R; van Bergen JE; van den Hoek JA; de Jong-van den Berg LT; Jager JC
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Dec; 144(49):2350-4. PubMed ID: 11129971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can a busy abortion service cope with a screen-and-treat policy for Chlamydia trachomatis infection?
Cameron ST; Stewart S; Sutherland S
Int J STD AIDS; 2003 Jan; 14(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 12590794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Chlamydia trachomatis: should it be systematically be screened or treated? Literature review and cost/benefit estimation in France].
Henry-Suchet J; Sluzhinska A; Serfaty D
Contracept Fertil Sex; 1998 Feb; 26(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 9560916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Potentials of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in Hungary: cost-benefit analysis].
Nyári T; Mészáros G; Deák J; Nagy E; Kovács L
Orv Hetil; 2000 Jul; 141(27):1511-6. PubMed ID: 10943109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women seeking termination of pregnancy 1985-2000].
Bakken IJ; Skjeldestad FE; Nordbø SA
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2004 Jun; 124(12):1638-40. PubMed ID: 15229710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rates of Chlamydia trachomatis testing and chlamydial infection in pregnant women.
Lawton B; Rose S; Bromhead C; Brown S; MacDonald J; Shepherd J
N Z Med J; 2004 May; 117(1194):U889. PubMed ID: 15156207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preventing infective sequelae of abortion.
Penney GC
Hum Reprod; 1997 Nov; 12(11 Suppl):107-12. PubMed ID: 9433966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
