These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8638329)

  • 1. [Cervical cancer in Frederiksborg County 1990-1991].
    Ingeholm P; Glenthøj A
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Feb; 158(7):915-8. PubMed ID: 8638329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of cytologic screening on the detection of cervical carcinoma.
    Yajima A; Mori T; Sato S; Wakisaka T; Suzuki M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 May; 59(5):565-8. PubMed ID: 7070726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in screening history, tumour characteristics and survival between women with screen-detected versus not screen-detected cervical cancer in the east of The Netherlands, 1992-2001.
    van der Aa MA; Schutter EM; Looijen-Salamon M; Martens JE; Siesling S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Aug; 139(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 18093720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of causes of increased incidence of cervical cancer in Slovenia.
    Smrkolj S; Rakar S; Mozina A; Erzen M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Dec; 117(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 15541860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening history in women with cervical cancer in a Danish population-based screening program.
    Kirschner B; Poll S; Rygaard C; Wåhlin A; Junge J
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Jan; 120(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 21035171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Review of the screening history of Alberta women with invasive cervical cancer.
    Stuart GC; McGregor SE; Duggan MA; Nation JG
    CMAJ; 1997 Sep; 157(5):513-9. PubMed ID: 9294389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
    Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors associated with tumour stage at presentation in invasive cervical cancer.
    Ndlovu N; Kambarami R
    Cent Afr J Med; 2003; 49(9-10):107-11. PubMed ID: 15298465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Socioeconomic differences in incidence of cervical cancer in Finland by cell type.
    Pukkala E; Malila N; Hakama M
    Acta Oncol; 2010; 49(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 20001504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [No major difference between population screening for cervical carcinoma at the present screening interval of 5 years and the former interval of 3 years].
    Vinkesteijn AS; Siemens FC; Boon ME; Kuypers JC; Kok LP
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 Sep; 148(36):1781-5. PubMed ID: 15495942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The changing pattern of cervical cancer in Northern Ireland 1965-1989.
    Robertson JH; Woodend B
    Ulster Med J; 1992 Apr; 61(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 1621297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Characteristics of uterine cancer detected by mass screening].
    Igarashi T; Konno R; Sato S; Yajima A
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1998 Aug; 25(10):1519-26. PubMed ID: 9725043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The rising incidence of adenocarcinoma relative to squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix in the United States--a 24-year population-based study.
    Smith HO; Tiffany MF; Qualls CR; Key CR
    Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Aug; 78(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 10926787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after three consecutive negative Pap smears.
    Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
    J Med Screen; 2003; 10(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 14738657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical screening history in patients with early stage carcinoma of the cervix.
    Abed Z; O'Leary M; Hand K; Flannelly G; Lenehan P; Murphy J; Foley M
    Ir Med J; 2006 May; 99(5):140-2. PubMed ID: 16892918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of histologic type and age on survival rates for invasive cervical carcinoma in Taiwan.
    Chen RJ; Lin YH; Chen CA; Huang SC; Chow SN; Hsieh CY
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 May; 73(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 10329032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical cancer screening in a rural population of Zimbabwe.
    Thistle PJ; Chirenje ZM
    Cent Afr J Med; 1997 Sep; 43(9):246-51. PubMed ID: 9509642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Gynecology-obstetrics at the Yalgado-Ouédraogo (Ouagadougou) National Hospital Center. Cancer of the cervix uteri: epidemio-clinical and anatomopathologic aspects].
    Lankoandé J; Sakandé B; Ouédraogo A; Ouédraogo CM; Ouattara T; Bonané B; Koné B
    Sante; 1997; 7(4):227-30. PubMed ID: 9410446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of the National Cervical Screening Programme on the presentation of cancer of the cervix in Canterbury.
    Simcock B; Sykes P; Laney M
    N Z Med J; 2001 Aug; 114(1138):378-80. PubMed ID: 11589435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.