These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Evaluation of the vertical holding appliance in treatment of high-angle patients. Deberardinis M; Stretesky T; Sinha P; Nanda RS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):700-5. PubMed ID: 10842113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Craniofacial parameters of Syrian children with β-thalassemia major. Takriti M; Dashash M J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 May; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 25426607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of rapid-slow maxillary expansion on the dentofacial structures. Kilic N; Oktay H Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 21175029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of extraction and non-extraction treatment effects by two different superimposition methods. Türköz Ç; İşcan HN Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):691-9. PubMed ID: 21378094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Craniofacial adaptations induced by chincup therapy in Class III patients. Deguchi T; McNamara JA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Feb; 115(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 9971929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vertical facial growth: a longitudinal study from 7 to 14 years of age. van der Beek MC; Hoeksma JB; Prahl-Andersen B Eur J Orthod; 1991 Jun; 13(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 1936138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes in mandibular position in treated Class II division 2 malocclusions in growing and non-growing subjects. AL-Nimri K; Abo-Zomor M; Alomari S Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 27468594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods. Arat ZM; Rübendüz M; Akgül AA Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 12940557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The validity of two methods of mandibular superimposition: a comparison with tantalum implants. Springate SD; Jones AG Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Mar; 113(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 9517716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The skeletodental adaptations in deep bite correction. McDowell EH; Baker IM Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):370-5. PubMed ID: 1927988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study. Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Compensation for vertical dysplasia and its clinical application. Anwar N; Fida M Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):516-22. PubMed ID: 19679646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Association between facial height development and mandibular growth rotation in low and high MP-SN angle faces: a longitudinal study. Karlsen AT Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 9107374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dental and facial skeletal characteristics and growth of males and females with class II, division 1 malocclusion between the ages of 10 and 14 (revisited)-part I: characteristics of size, form, and position. Rothstein T; Yoon-Tarlie C Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):320-32. PubMed ID: 10715092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mandibular position in class III malocclusion. Kerr WJ; TenHave TR Br J Orthod; 1988 Nov; 15(4):241-5. PubMed ID: 3203099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Glenoid fossa position in Class II malocclusion associated with mandibular retrusion. Giuntini V; De Toffol L; Franchi L; Baccetti T Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):808-12. PubMed ID: 18298205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]