128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8638568)
1. Superimposition and structural analysis.
Schudy F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Feb; 109(2):180-92. PubMed ID: 8638568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Superimposition and structural analysis.
Isaacson RJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Feb; 109(2):193-5. PubMed ID: 8638569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the vertical holding appliance in treatment of high-angle patients.
Deberardinis M; Stretesky T; Sinha P; Nanda RS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):700-5. PubMed ID: 10842113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Craniofacial parameters of Syrian children with β-thalassemia major.
Takriti M; Dashash M
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 May; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 25426607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of rapid-slow maxillary expansion on the dentofacial structures.
Kilic N; Oktay H
Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 21175029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of extraction and non-extraction treatment effects by two different superimposition methods.
Türköz Ç; İşcan HN
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):691-9. PubMed ID: 21378094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Craniofacial adaptations induced by chincup therapy in Class III patients.
Deguchi T; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Feb; 115(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 9971929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vertical facial growth: a longitudinal study from 7 to 14 years of age.
van der Beek MC; Hoeksma JB; Prahl-Andersen B
Eur J Orthod; 1991 Jun; 13(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 1936138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes in mandibular position in treated Class II division 2 malocclusions in growing and non-growing subjects.
AL-Nimri K; Abo-Zomor M; Alomari S
Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 27468594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods.
Arat ZM; Rübendüz M; Akgül AA
Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 12940557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The validity of two methods of mandibular superimposition: a comparison with tantalum implants.
Springate SD; Jones AG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Mar; 113(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 9517716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The skeletodental adaptations in deep bite correction.
McDowell EH; Baker IM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):370-5. PubMed ID: 1927988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Compensation for vertical dysplasia and its clinical application.
Anwar N; Fida M
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):516-22. PubMed ID: 19679646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Association between facial height development and mandibular growth rotation in low and high MP-SN angle faces: a longitudinal study.
Karlsen AT
Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 9107374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dental and facial skeletal characteristics and growth of males and females with class II, division 1 malocclusion between the ages of 10 and 14 (revisited)-part I: characteristics of size, form, and position.
Rothstein T; Yoon-Tarlie C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):320-32. PubMed ID: 10715092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mandibular position in class III malocclusion.
Kerr WJ; TenHave TR
Br J Orthod; 1988 Nov; 15(4):241-5. PubMed ID: 3203099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Glenoid fossa position in Class II malocclusion associated with mandibular retrusion.
Giuntini V; De Toffol L; Franchi L; Baccetti T
Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):808-12. PubMed ID: 18298205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Procuste cephalometry].
Penin X
Orthod Fr; 2006 Dec; 77(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 17402222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cephalometric superimposition on the occipital condyles as a longitudinal growth assessment reference: I-point and I-curve.
Standerwick R; Roberts E; Hartsfield J; Babler W; Kanomi R
Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2008 Dec; 291(12):1603-10. PubMed ID: 18833570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
