These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8638579)

  • 1. Distal movement of buccal segments with the "en masse" removable appliance: its value in treating patients with mild Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. Part II: the model measuring system and results.
    Orton HS; Battagel JM; Ferguson R; Ferman AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Apr; 109(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 8638579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distal movement of buccal segments with the "en masse" removable appliance--its value in treating patients with mild Class II, Division 1 malocclusions: Part I, clinical techniques (how to do it).
    Orton HS; Battagel JM; Ferguson R; Ferman AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Mar; 109(3):234-43. PubMed ID: 8607468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment changes in Class I and mild Class II malocclusions using the en masse removable appliance.
    Battagel JM; Ryan A
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Feb; 20(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 9558760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of arch dimension changes in 1-phase vs 2-phase treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    Wortham JR; Dolce C; McGorray SP; Le H; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 19577150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the dental arch changes in patients with different malocclusions.
    Singh DP; Garg AK; Singh SP; Krishna Nayak US; Gupta M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):623-9. PubMed ID: 25511063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonextraction treatment of a high-angle class II malocclusion: a case report.
    Giancotti A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):721-7. PubMed ID: 10842116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Severe unilateral scissors-bite with a constricted mandibular arch: Bite turbos and extra-alveolar bone screws in the infrazygomatic crests and mandibular buccal shelf.
    Lee SA; Chang CCH; Roberts WE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Oct; 154(4):554-569. PubMed ID: 30268266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spontaneous lower arch changes with and without second molar extractions.
    Battagel JM; Ryan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Feb; 113(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 9484204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term stability of Angle Class II, division 1 malocclusions with successful occlusal results at end of active treatment.
    Fidler BC; Artun J; Joondeph DR; Little RM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Mar; 107(3):276-85. PubMed ID: 7879760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative cephalometric study of Class II malocclusion treatment with Pendulum and Jones jig appliances followed by fixed corrective orthodontics.
    Patel MP; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; Pinzan A; Janson G; de Freitas MR
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(6):58-64. PubMed ID: 24351151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized clinical trial comparing control of maxillary anchorage with 2 retraction techniques.
    Xu TM; Zhang X; Oh HS; Boyd RL; Korn EL; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):544.e1-9; discussion 544-5. PubMed ID: 21055588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non extraction short-term arch changes.
    Ferro F; Perillo L; Ferro A
    Prog Orthod; 2004; 5():18-43. PubMed ID: 15329745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional dental arch changes of patients submitted to orthodontic-surgical treatment for correction of Class II malocclusion.
    Peixoto AP; dos Santos Pinto A; Garib DG; Gonçalves JR
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(4):71-9. PubMed ID: 25279524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination.
    Acar AG; Gürsoy S; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 20231213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample.
    Al-Khateeb SN; Abu Alhaija ES
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):459-65. PubMed ID: 16637727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Jones jig molar distalization appliance with extraoral traction.
    Haydar S; Uner O
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jan; 117(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 10629519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Headgear versus function regulator in the early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial.
    Ghafari J; Shofer FS; Jacobsson-Hunt U; Markowitz DL; Laster LL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jan; 113(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 9457019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distal movement of the maxillary molar using an active removable appliance and extraoral force: a case report.
    Johnson BE
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Jan; 25(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 8190880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maxillary traction splint: a cephalometric evaluation.
    Caldwell SF; Hymas TA; Timm TA
    Am J Orthod; 1984 May; 85(5):376-84. PubMed ID: 6586076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion.
    de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Almeida MR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):833-42. PubMed ID: 19962606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.