These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8638582)

  • 1. Effect of varying etching times on the bond strength of ceramic brackets.
    Olsen ME; Bishara SE; Boyer DB; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Apr; 109(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 8638582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Scotchbond Multipurpose and maleic acid as alternative methods of bonding orthodontic brackets.
    Olsen ME; Bishara SE; Damon P; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 May; 111(5):498-501. PubMed ID: 9155808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of fluoride application on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Damon PL; Bishara SE; Olsen ME; Jakobsen JR
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 8678347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of applying chlorhexidine antibacterial agent on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Bishara SE; Damon PL; Olsen ME; Jakobsen JR
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(4):313-6. PubMed ID: 8863968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bracket bonding with 15- or 60-second etching and adhesive remaining on enamel after debonding.
    Osorio R; Toledano M; Garcia-Godoy F
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 10022184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of shear bond strength and surface structure between conventional acid etching and air-abrasion of human enamel.
    Olsen ME; Bishara SE; Damon P; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Nov; 112(5):502-6. PubMed ID: 9387836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of nonrinse conditioning solution and a compomer as an alternative method of bonding orthodontic bracket.
    Bishara SE; Laffoon JF; VonWald L; Warren JJ
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Dec; 71(6):461-5. PubMed ID: 11771784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparisons of shear bond strength of precoated and uncoated brackets.
    Bishara SE; Olsen M; Von Wald L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Dec; 112(6):617-21. PubMed ID: 9423693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of various methods of chlorhexidine application on shear bond strength.
    Bishara SE; Vonwald L; Zamtua J; Damon PL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Aug; 114(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 9714279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs.
    Bishara SE; Olsen ME; VonWald L; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 10393585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of reduction of phosphoric acid concentration on the shear bond strength of brackets.
    Carstensen W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):274-7. PubMed ID: 7661144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shear bond strength of composite, glass ionomer, and acidic primer adhesive systems.
    Bishara SE; Gordan VV; VonWald L; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jan; 115(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 9878954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shear strength of ceramic brackets bonded to etched or unetched enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Martin S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 8611486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of different types of enamel conditioners on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Davari AR; Yassaei S; Daneshkazemi AR; Yosefi MH
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 17211503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Diode Laser Debonding of Ceramic Brackets on Enamel Surface and Pulpal Temperature.
    Yassaei S; Soleimanian A; Nik ZE
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Apr; 16(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 26067728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC.
    Rix D; Foley TF; Mamandras A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 11174538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of debonding characteristics of a new collapsible ceramic bracket.
    Bishara SE; Olsen ME; Von Wald L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Nov; 112(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 9387843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods.
    Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Ozkalayci N; Turk T
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 19164413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of microcracks and shear bond strength after debonding orthodontic ceramic brackets on enamel priorly etched by different Er,Cr:YSGG and Er:YAG laser settings without acid application: An in vitro study.
    Hoteit M; Nammour S; Zeinoun T
    Int Orthod; 2019 Dec; 17(4):744-757. PubMed ID: 31543426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.