130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8640470)
1. A randomized study comparing suture with non-suture cold-knife conization.
Tangtrakul S; Srisupundit S; Linasmita V; Bullangpoti S; Israngura N; Wilailak S; Panijayanusondthi O
J Obstet Gynaecol (Tokyo 1995); 1995 Dec; 21(6):587-91. PubMed ID: 8640470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of different instruments and suture methods of conization for cervical lesions.
Wang X; Li L; Bi Y; Wu H; Wu M; Lang J
Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):19114. PubMed ID: 31836814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cold knife conization and loop excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Takac I; Gorisek B
Tumori; 1999; 85(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 10587025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Superiority of electrocautery over the suture method for achieving cervical cone bed hemostasis.
Kamat AA; Kramer P; Soisson AP
Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Oct; 102(4):726-30. PubMed ID: 14551002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized clinical trial comparing cold knife conization of the cervix with and without lateral hemostatic sutures.
Bueno LR; Binda M; Monego H; Scherer RL; Rolim KM; Bottini AL; Fregnani JH; dos Reis R
Int J Surg; 2015 Jun; 18():224-9. PubMed ID: 25937157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cold knife conization vs. LEEP. Are they the same procedure?
Fanning J; Padratzik J
J Reprod Med; 2002 Jan; 47(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 11838307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy.
Moore BC; Higgins RV; Laurent SL; Marroum MC; Bellitt P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):361-6; discussion 366-8. PubMed ID: 7645609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modified method of cervical conization with hybrid use of a cold knife and an electric knife for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Zhang W; Lin Y
J Int Med Res; 2022 Jun; 50(6):3000605221106414. PubMed ID: 35726589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Haemostasis after cold-knife conisation: a randomised prospective trial comparing cerclage suture versus electro-cauterization.
Dane C; Dane B; Cetin A; Erginbas M
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Jun; 48(3):343-7. PubMed ID: 18532969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical outcomes of cases with cervical dysplasia absent in cold knife conization specimens.
Baser E; Ozgu E; Erkilinc S; Yalcin H; Cetinkaya N; Sirvan L; Erkaya S; Gungor T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014 Jan; 14(11):6693-6. PubMed ID: 24377590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Loop diathermy and cold-knife conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a comparative study.
Kim YT; Kim JW; Kim DK; Song CH
J Korean Med Sci; 1995 Aug; 10(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 8593209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Reasonable surgical approach for grade III cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Wu X; Cui Y; Gong Y; Xu H; Jiang D; Meng S
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Aug; 37(8):824-8. PubMed ID: 22954923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [LEEP versus cold knife conization for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias].
Hillemanns P; Kimmig R; Dannecker C; Noorzai T; Diebold J; Thaler CJ; Hepp H
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2000; 122(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10785949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia before and after introduction of laser conization].
Nordland K; Skjeldestad FE; Hagen B
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2005 Jan; 125(2):167-9. PubMed ID: 15665889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP.
Mathevet P; Chemali E; Roy M; Dargent D
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2003 Feb; 106(2):214-8. PubMed ID: 12551795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Delivery outcome after cold-knife conization of the uterine cervix.
Klaritsch P; Reich O; Giuliani A; Tamussino K; Haas J; Winter R
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Nov; 103(2):604-7. PubMed ID: 16750257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cold-knife conization versus conization by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a randomized, prospective study.
Duggan BD; Felix JC; Muderspach LI; Gebhardt JA; Groshen S; Morrow CP; Roman LD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Feb; 180(2 Pt 1):276-82. PubMed ID: 9988787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laser conization versus cold knife conization.
Larsson G; Alm P; Grundsell H
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1982 Jan; 154(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 7053590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cold-knife conization versus the loop electrosurgical excision procedure for treatment of cervical dysplasia.
Bozanović T; Ljubic A; Momcilov P; Milicevic S; Mostić T; Atanacković J
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2008; 29(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 18386472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Loop conization for the treatment of microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix.
Tseng CJ; Chang CC; Tseng CC; Hou HC; Wang CB; Chen CH; Soong YK; Pao CC
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2006; 16(4):1574-8. PubMed ID: 16884368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
