These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8640479)
1. [Interaction effects in the lateral visual field: an extension of Bouma's (1970) approach]. Heller D; Huckauf A; Nazir T Z Exp Psychol; 1995; 42(3):386-418. PubMed ID: 8640479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Letter identification and lateral masking in dyslexic and average readers. Goolkasian P; King J Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(4):519-38. PubMed ID: 2275487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inhibition of return in subliminal letter priming. Marzouki Y; Grainger J; Theeuwes J Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 18582840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Size scaling and spatial factors in visual attention. Goolkasian P Am J Psychol; 1997; 110(3):397-415. PubMed ID: 9339537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ERP topography and human perceptual learning in the peripheral visual field. Shoji H; Skrandies W Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 16356572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lateral masking: limitations of the feature interaction account. Huckauf A; Heller D; Nazir TA Percept Psychophys; 1999 Jan; 61(1):177-89. PubMed ID: 10070209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Representation of letters when mislocation errors occur. Chastain G J Gen Psychol; 1990 Apr; 117(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 2366047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect. Jordan TR; Patching GR Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retinal location and its effect on the spatial distribution of visual attention. Goolkasian P Am J Psychol; 1999; 112(2):187-214. PubMed ID: 10696275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects. Hommuk K; Bachmann T J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 19485683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Orientation repulsion and attraction in alignment perception. Tzvetanov T; Wirmer A; Folta K Vision Res; 2007 Jun; 47(12):1693-704. PubMed ID: 17451776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The importance of information localization in scene gist recognition. Loschky LC; Sethi A; Simons DJ; Pydimarri TN; Ochs D; Corbeille JL J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1431-50. PubMed ID: 18085955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differentiation of holistic processing in the time course of letter recognition. Lachmann T; van Leeuwen C Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):121-9. PubMed ID: 18586218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The neural basis of perceptual hypothesis generation and testing. Weidner R; Shah NJ; Fink GR J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 18(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 16494685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A test of perceptual enhancement with peripherally presented letter pairs. Chastain G J Gen Psychol; 1990 Jul; 117(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 2213000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attending to eye movements and retinal eccentricity: evidence for the activity distribution model of attention reconsidered. Turk-Browne NB; Pratt J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):1061-6. PubMed ID: 16262498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contralateral visual masking may be an artifact. Fein G; Brown FF J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1987 Apr; 9(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 3558749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contributions of lateral inhibition to object substitution masking and attention. Bridgeman B Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(24):4075-82. PubMed ID: 17007902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]