495 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8641844)
1. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma.
Smith SD; Katz J; Quigley HA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Jun; 37(7):1419-28. PubMed ID: 8641844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual field progression in glaucoma: total versus pattern deviation analyses.
Artes PH; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 46(12):4600-6. PubMed ID: 16303955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors affecting rates of visual field progression in glaucoma patients with optic disc hemorrhage.
Prata TS; De Moraes CG; Teng CC; Tello C; Ritch R; Liebmann JM
Ophthalmology; 2010 Jan; 117(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 19896197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Glaucoma surgery decreases the rates of localized and global visual field progression.
Folgar FA; de Moraes CG; Prata TS; Teng CC; Tello C; Ritch R; Liebmann JM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Feb; 149(2):258-264.e2. PubMed ID: 20103054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Natural history of open-angle glaucoma.
Heijl A; Bengtsson B; Hyman L; Leske MC;
Ophthalmology; 2009 Dec; 116(12):2271-6. PubMed ID: 19854514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incidence and rates of visual field progression after longitudinally measured optic disc change in glaucoma.
Chauhan BC; Nicolela MT; Artes PH
Ophthalmology; 2009 Nov; 116(11):2110-8. PubMed ID: 19500850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pointwise linear regression analysis for detection of visual field progression with absolute versus corrected threshold sensitivities.
Manassakorn A; Nouri-Mahdavi K; Koucheki B; Law SK; Caprioli J
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jul; 47(7):2896-903. PubMed ID: 16799031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optic disc and visual field changes after trabeculectomy.
Kotecha A; Spratt A; Bunce C; Garway-Heath DF; Khaw PT; Viswanathan A;
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Oct; 50(10):4693-9. PubMed ID: 19474409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Repeatability of the Glaucoma Hemifield Test in automated perimetry.
Katz J; Quigley HA; Sommer A
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jul; 36(8):1658-64. PubMed ID: 7601645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression.
Bengtsson B; Heijl A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):343-53. PubMed ID: 18078852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Glaucomatous visual fields. FASTPAC versus full threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
Schaumberger M; Schäfer B; Lachenmayr BJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jun; 36(7):1390-7. PubMed ID: 7775117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study.
Haymes SA; Hutchison DM; McCormick TA; Varma DK; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 46(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 15671281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive factors for glaucomatous visual field progression in the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study.
Nouri-Mahdavi K; Hoffman D; Coleman AL; Liu G; Li G; Gaasterland D; Caprioli J;
Ophthalmology; 2004 Sep; 111(9):1627-35. PubMed ID: 15350314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The relation between intraocular pressure peak in the water drinking test and visual field progression in glaucoma.
Susanna R; Vessani RM; Sakata L; Zacarias LC; Hatanaka M
Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Oct; 89(10):1298-301. PubMed ID: 16170120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual field index rate and event-based glaucoma progression analysis: comparison in a glaucoma population.
Casas-Llera P; Rebolleda G; Muñoz-Negrete FJ; Arnalich-Montiel F; Pérez-López M; Fernández-Buenaga R
Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 93(12):1576-9. PubMed ID: 19535357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The efficacy of the dicon screening field to detect eyes with glaucomatous field loss by Humphrey threshold testing.
Huang AS; Smith SD; Quigley HA
J Glaucoma; 1998 Jun; 7(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 9627854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraocular pressure fluctuation a risk factor for visual field progression at low intraocular pressures in the advanced glaucoma intervention study.
Caprioli J; Coleman AL
Ophthalmology; 2008 Jul; 115(7):1123-1129.e3. PubMed ID: 18082889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
