88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8642120)
1. Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. III. Pulse polarity.
Coste RL; Pfingst BE
J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 May; 99(5):3099-108. PubMed ID: 8642120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. I: Phase duration and stimulus duration.
Pfingst BE; DeHaan DR; Holloway LA
J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1857-66. PubMed ID: 1960279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interactions between pulse separation and pulse polarity order in cochlear implants.
Miller AL; Morris DJ; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 1997 Jul; 109(1-2):21-33. PubMed ID: 9259233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. II: Frequency and interpulse interval.
Pfingst BE; Morris DJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Sep; 94(3 Pt 1):1287-94. PubMed ID: 8408969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of electrical current configuration on stimulus detection.
Pfingst BE; Miller AL; Morris DJ; Zwolan TA; Spelman FA; Clopton BM
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():127-31. PubMed ID: 7668603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of electrical pulse polarity shape on intra cochlear neural responses in humans: Triphasic pulses with anodic and cathodic second phase.
Herrmann DP; Kretzer KVA; Pieper SH; Bahmer A
Hear Res; 2021 Dec; 412():108375. PubMed ID: 34749281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory detection and discrimination in deaf cats: psychophysical and neural thresholds for intracochlear electrical signals.
Vollmer M; Beitel RE; Snyder RL
J Neurophysiol; 2001 Nov; 86(5):2330-43. PubMed ID: 11698523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of electrode configuration on threshold functions for electrical stimulation of the cochlea.
Pfingst BE; Morris DJ; Miller AL
Hear Res; 1995 May; 85(1-2):76-84. PubMed ID: 7559181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Across-species comparisons of psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea: II. Strength-duration functions for single, biphasic pulses.
Miller AL; Smith DW; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 1999 Sep; 135(1-2):47-55. PubMed ID: 10491953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of phase duration on detection of electrical stimulation of the human cochlea.
Moon AK; Zwolan TA; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 1993 May; 67(1-2):166-78. PubMed ID: 8340268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of pulse separation on detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the human cochlea.
Pfingst BE; Holloway LA; Razzaque SA
Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 98(1-2):77-92. PubMed ID: 8880183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fibre response properties.
Shepherd RK; Javel E
Hear Res; 1999 Apr; 130(1-2):171-88. PubMed ID: 10320107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of electrical pulse polarity shape on intra cochlear neural responses in humans: triphasic pulses with cathodic second phase.
Bahmer A; Baumann U
Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():123-30. PubMed ID: 24161948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Behavioral and neurophysiological thresholds for electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat.
Beitel RE; Vollmer M; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Leake PA
Audiol Neurootol; 2000; 5(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 10686430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of triphasic pulses with adjustable phase amplitude ratio (PAR) for cochlear ECAP recording: I. amplitude growth functions.
Bahmer A; Baumann U
J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Mar; 205(1):202-11. PubMed ID: 22209768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of pulse trains in the electrically stimulated cochlea: effects of cochlear health.
Pfingst BE; Colesa DJ; Hembrador S; Kang SY; Middlebrooks JC; Raphael Y; Su GL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):3954-68. PubMed ID: 22225050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation.
Carlyon RP; van Wieringen A; Deeks JM; Long CJ; Lyzenga J; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):210-24. PubMed ID: 15953530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Psychophysical evaluation of cochlear prostheses in a monkey model.
Pfingst BE; Donaldson JA; Miller JM; Spelman FA
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1979; 88(5 Pt 1):613-25. PubMed ID: 115356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes over time in thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea.
Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 1990 Dec; 50(1-2):225-36. PubMed ID: 2076974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
