These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 864350)
1. A simple method of preparing patients for oral cholecystography. Damrongsak D; Kalayasiri C J Med Assoc Thai; 1977 Feb; 60(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 864350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Sodium taurocholate, ineffective as an adjuvant in oral cholecystography. Katevuo K; Kormano M Radiologe; 1982 Jan; 22(1):32-3. PubMed ID: 7063664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of new methods of preparation for cholecystography and barium enema]. Kordowska M; Walecka A; SowiĆski R; Wierzbicka-Paczos E Wiad Lek; 1984 Jan; 37(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 6464441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of oral cholecystography agents in the treatment of hyperthyroidism of subacute thyroiditis. Martinez DS; Chopra IJ Panminerva Med; 2003 Mar; 45(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 12682620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The use of bilimin in the radiologic study of the gallbladder]. Kanishchev PA; Sokolov AL Vrach Delo; 1989 May; (5):68-9. PubMed ID: 2773441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical comparison of locetamic acid (cholebrine) and ipodate sodium (Orgrafin). Neal RR; Harvey KG; Cantwell KG; Press HC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1979 May; 132(5):735-6. PubMed ID: 155391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Oral cholangiocholecystography. Potentiation method by means of a gastrokinetic agent]. Napoli D; Milano A Ann Radiol Diagn (Bologna); 1969 Sep; 42(6):509-21. PubMed ID: 5397420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of calcium Oragrafin granules in repeat cholecystography, with supplemental ultrasonographic evaluation. Fiske SA; Stamper DW J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1984 Mar; 83(7):512-5. PubMed ID: 6706718 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cholecystography after rectal administration of ipodate salts. A preliminary report. Lo Curcio S; Hughes J; Edmunds R; Finby N Radiology; 1966 Apr; 86(4):736-41. PubMed ID: 5934328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Conventional oral cholecystography versus single-visit oral cholecystography. Nathan MH; Newman A Am J Gastroenterol; 1981 Dec; 76(6):527-9. PubMed ID: 7331984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparative study of the preparation biloptin in experimental peroral cholecystography]. Sviridov NK; Seliverstov SA; Kostin VN Eksp Khir Anesteziol; 1976; (5):46-8. PubMed ID: 1022469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Oral radiological evaluation of the biliary tract. Jones BE Australas Radiol; 1976 Mar; 20(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 962748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Efficacy of the oral contrast medium Falignost in fractionated cholangio-cholecystography]. Loreck D Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1977; 18(3):359-68. PubMed ID: 905546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Evaluation of the results of a clinical study of the x-ray specific activity of the Soviet x-ray contrast medium bilimin, intended for peroral cholecystography and cholecystocholangiography]. Rozenshtraukh LS; Rabkin IKh; Absava GI Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1985; (2):19-23. PubMed ID: 4013059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Peroral cholecystography and gastroduodenoscopy in patients with Gilbert's syndrome]. Eselev MM; Stsepuro PG Vrach Delo; 1988 Aug; (8):18-9. PubMed ID: 3206874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Potentiated peroral cholecystography and simultaneous multiple tomography with Synchroplan. A new approach to the study of bile duct pathology]. Bianchi SD; Granone A; Mecozzi B; Gatti G Minerva Med; 1981 May; 72(21):1325-30. PubMed ID: 7231783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]