These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8643980)

  • 1. Abortion law and practice in China: an overview with comparisons to the United States.
    Rigdon SM
    Soc Sci Med; 1996 Feb; 42(4):543-60. PubMed ID: 8643980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Women's perspectives on abortion in Romania.
    Johnson BR; Horga M; Andronache L
    Soc Sci Med; 1996 Feb; 42(4):521-30. PubMed ID: 8643978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abortion laws and policies: challenges and opportunities.
    Cook RJ
    Suppl Int J Gynecol Obstet; 1989; 3():61-87. PubMed ID: 2686706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abortion in Turkey: a matter of state, family or individual decision.
    Gürsoy A
    Soc Sci Med; 1996 Feb; 42(4):531-42. PubMed ID: 8643979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recent evidence on the broad benefits of reproductive health policy.
    Bailey MJ; Guldi M; Hershbein BJ
    J Policy Anal Manage; 2013; 32(4):888-96. PubMed ID: 24665471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increase in obstacles to abortion: the American perspective in 2004.
    Donohoe M
    J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972); 2005; 60(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 16845763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. International developments in abortion law from 1988 to 1998.
    Cook RJ; Dickens BM; Bliss LE
    Am J Public Health; 1999 Apr; 89(4):579-86. PubMed ID: 10191808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Commentary on the law and abortion in the Philippines.
    Tadiar AF
    Suppl Int J Gynecol Obstet; 1989; 3():89-92. PubMed ID: 2590483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The abortion battle: the Canadian scene.
    Sachdev P
    Med Law; 1994; 13(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 8065237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Liberty, utility, and justice: an ethical approach to unwanted pregnancy.
    Macklin R
    Suppl Int J Gynecol Obstet; 1989; 3():37-49. PubMed ID: 2590480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human rights dynamics of abortion law reform.
    Cook RJ; Dickens BM
    Hum Rights Q; 2003 Feb; 25(1):1-59. PubMed ID: 15719517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States.
    Weitz TA; Yanow S
    Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speak out for reproductive rights.
    Gonzalez-Pardo L
    J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972); 1992; 47(3):67. PubMed ID: 1624662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A chill wind blows: Webster, obstetrics, and the health of women.
    Chavkin W; Rosenfield A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Aug; 163(2):450-2. PubMed ID: 2386130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproductive rights and the medical care system: a plea for rational health policy.
    Stephenson PA; Wagner MG
    J Public Health Policy; 1993; 14(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 8408608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abortion as empowerment: reproductive rights activism in a legally restricted context.
    McReynolds-Pérez J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Nov; 17(Suppl 2):350. PubMed ID: 29143680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Roe v. Wade at twenty-nine: the future of abortion rights in the U.S. remains an open question.
    Drenning MG
    Health Care Law Mon; 2002 Feb; ():6-7. PubMed ID: 12436734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproductive health law: where next, after Cairo and Beijing?
    Cook RJ
    Med Law; 1997; 16(1):169-78. PubMed ID: 9212609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court. Conclusion: the future of abortion as a "private choice".
    Grant ER
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):233-43. PubMed ID: 2603867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of the Human Genome Initiative on women's rights and reproductive decisions.
    Charo RA
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr; 8(Suppl. 1):148-59. PubMed ID: 11653014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.