These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8644887)

  • 1. Attentional selection and word processing in Stroop and word search tasks: the role of selection for action.
    Brown TL
    Am J Psychol; 1996; 109(2):265-86. PubMed ID: 8644887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of color word availability on the Stroop color-naming effect.
    Kim H; Cho YS; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1540-51. PubMed ID: 19064496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oddball and incongruity effects during Stroop task performance: a comparative fMRI study on selective attention.
    Melcher T; Gruber O
    Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1121(1):136-49. PubMed ID: 17022954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automaticity in reading and the Stroop task: testing the limits of involuntary word processing.
    Brown TL; Joneleit K; Robinson CS; Brown CR
    Am J Psychol; 2002; 115(4):515-43. PubMed ID: 12516527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An ERP investigation of the Stroop task: the role of the cingulate in attentional allocation and conflict resolution.
    Badzakova-Trajkov G; Barnett KJ; Waldie KE; Kirk IJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1253():139-48. PubMed ID: 19084509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Stroop effect for spatial orientation.
    Wühr P
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Jul; 134(3):285-94. PubMed ID: 17824399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of procedural variations on lateralized Stroop effects.
    Weekes NY; Zaidel E
    Brain Cogn; 1996 Aug; 31(3):308-30. PubMed ID: 8812012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location.
    Cho YS; Lien MC; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):826-39. PubMed ID: 16846282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Likelihood of attending to the color word modulates Stroop interference.
    Cho YS; Choi JM; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):416-29. PubMed ID: 22147533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response selection in visual search: the influence of response compatibility of nontargets.
    Starreveld PA; Theeuwes J; Mortier K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):56-78. PubMed ID: 14769068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coloring only a single letter does not eliminate color-word interference in a vocal-response Stroop task: automaticity revealed.
    Marmurek HH
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Apr; 130(2):207-24. PubMed ID: 12773021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stroop dilution revisited: evidence for domain-specific, limited-capacity processing.
    Roberts MA; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 15709859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Isolation of specific interference processing in the Stroop task: PET activation studies.
    Taylor SF; Kornblum S; Lauber EJ; Minoshima S; Koeppe RA
    Neuroimage; 1997 Aug; 6(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 9299382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Functional connectivity during Stroop task performance.
    Harrison BJ; Shaw M; Yücel M; Purcell R; Brewer WJ; Strother SC; Egan GF; Olver JS; Nathan PJ; Pantelis C
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(1):181-91. PubMed ID: 15588609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Test-retest reliability of standard and emotional stroop tasks: an investigation of color-word and picture-word versions.
    Strauss GP; Allen DN; Jorgensen ML; Cramer SL
    Assessment; 2005 Sep; 12(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 16123253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Negative priming effects in children engaged in nonspatial tasks: evidence for early development of an intact inhibitory mechanism.
    Pritchard VE; Neumann E
    Dev Psychol; 2004 Mar; 40(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 14979760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental evidence for interpretive but not attention biases towards somatic information in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome.
    Moss-Morris R; Petrie KJ
    Br J Health Psychol; 2003 May; 8(Pt 2):195-208. PubMed ID: 12804333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the nonautomaticity of visual word processing: electrophysiological evidence that word processing requires central attention.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Cornett L; Goodin Z; Allen PA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):751-73. PubMed ID: 18505335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stroop dilution but not word-processing dilution: evidence for attention capture.
    Mitterer H; La Heij W; Van der Heijden AH
    Psychol Res; 2003 Feb; 67(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 12589448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differential processing of word and color in unilateral spatial neglect.
    Morein-Zamir S; Henik A; Balas M; Soroker N
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 May; 23(2-3):259-69. PubMed ID: 15820633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.