These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8644887)

  • 21. A case for inhibition: visual attention suppresses the processing of irrelevant objects.
    Wühr P; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Feb; 137(1):116-30. PubMed ID: 18248132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Event-related potentials during an emotional Stroop task.
    Thomas SJ; Johnstone SJ; Gonsalvez CJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Mar; 63(3):221-31. PubMed ID: 17123655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. P300-based Stroop study with low probability and target Stroop oddballs: the evidence still favors the response selection hypothesis.
    Rosenfeld JP; Skogsberg KR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jun; 60(3):240-50. PubMed ID: 16102861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. ADHD and Stroop interference from age 9 to age 41 years: a meta-analysis of developmental effects.
    Schwartz K; Verhaeghen P
    Psychol Med; 2008 Nov; 38(11):1607-16. PubMed ID: 18226285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Word semantics is processed even without attentional effort.
    Relander K; Rämä P; Kujala T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1511-22. PubMed ID: 18823236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attending to the distractor and old/new discriminations in negative priming.
    Healy D; Burt JS
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Apr; 56(3):421-43. PubMed ID: 12745842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Severe tinnitus and its effect on selective and divided attention.
    Stevens C; Walker G; Boyer M; Gallagher M
    Int J Audiol; 2007 May; 46(5):208-16. PubMed ID: 17487668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Modularity beyond perception: evidence from single task interference paradigms.
    Magen H; Cohen A
    Cogn Psychol; 2007 Aug; 55(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 17083928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual search and dual tasks reveal two distinct attentional resources.
    VanRullen R; Reddy L; Koch C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 15006031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of auditory presentation of words on color naming: the intermodal Stroop effect.
    Shimada H
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 2):1155-61. PubMed ID: 2399091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The visual-auditory color-word stroop asymmetry and its time course.
    Roelofs A
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Dec; 33(8):1325-36. PubMed ID: 16615380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Common and distinct neural substrates of attentional control in an integrated Simon and spatial Stroop task as assessed by event-related fMRI.
    Liu X; Banich MT; Jacobson BL; Tanabe JL
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jul; 22(3):1097-106. PubMed ID: 15219581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Task-dependent modulation of neglect dyslexia? Novel evidence from the viewing position effect.
    Stenneken P; van Eimeren L; Keller I; Jacobs AM; Kerkhoff G
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():166-78. PubMed ID: 18054900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visual half-field Stroop effects with spatial separation of words and color targets.
    Brown TL; Gore CL; Pearson T
    Brain Lang; 1998 Jun; 63(1):122-42. PubMed ID: 9642024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Attention, temporal predictability, and the time course of context effects in naming performance.
    Roelofs A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Feb; 133(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 19963201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Visual word form familiarity and attention in lateral difference during processing Japanese Kana words.
    Nakagawa A; Sukigara M
    Brain Lang; 2000 Sep; 74(2):223-37. PubMed ID: 10950916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Task switching: a PDP model.
    Gilbert SJ; Shallice T
    Cogn Psychol; 2002 May; 44(3):297-337. PubMed ID: 11971634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stroop interference and the timing of selective response activation.
    Lansbergen MM; Kenemans JL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 119(10):2247-54. PubMed ID: 18762447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A parallel distributed processing approach to automaticity.
    Cohen JD; Servan-Schreiber D; McClelland JL
    Am J Psychol; 1992; 105(2):239-69. PubMed ID: 1621882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interactions between color and word processing in a flanker task.
    Henik A; Ro T; Merrill D; Rafal R; Safadi Z
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Feb; 25(1):198-209. PubMed ID: 10069032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.