These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8645639)
1. Routine obstetric ultrasound examinations in South Africa: cost and effect on perinatal outcome--a prospective randomised controlled trial. Geerts LT; Brand EJ; Theron GB Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Jun; 103(6):501-7. PubMed ID: 8645639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomised controlled trial of Doppler ultrasound screening of placental perfusion during pregnancy. Davies JA; Gallivan S; Spencer JA Lancet; 1992 Nov; 340(8831):1299-303. PubMed ID: 1360032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A community-based obstetric ultrasound service. Geerts L; Theron AM; Grove D; Theron GB; Odendaal HJ Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2004 Jan; 84(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 14698826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health Pregnancy, Healthy Baby: testing the added benefits of pregnancy ultrasound scan for child development in a randomised control trial. Richter L; Slemming W; Norris SA; Stein A; Poston L; Pasupathy D Trials; 2020 Jan; 21(1):25. PubMed ID: 31907018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Antenatal ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities: a systematic review of studies of cost and cost effectiveness. Roberts T; Henderson J; Mugford M; Bricker L; Neilson J; Garcia J BJOG; 2002 Jan; 109(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 11843373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomised controlled trial of a reduced-visits programme of antenatal care in Harare, Zimbabwe. Munjanja SP; Lindmark G; Nyström L Lancet; 1996 Aug; 348(9024):364-9. PubMed ID: 8709734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of routine third trimester ultrasound screening for intrauterine growth restriction: study protocol of a nationwide stepped wedge cluster-randomized trial in The Netherlands (The IRIS Study). Henrichs J; Verfaille V; Viester L; Westerneng M; Molewijk B; Franx A; van der Horst H; Bosmans JE; de Jonge A; Jellema P; BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Oct; 16(1):310. PubMed ID: 27737654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of one-stage ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a report from the Helsinki ultrasound trial. Leivo T; Tuominen R; Saari-Kemppainen A; Ylöstalo P; Karjalainen O; Heinonen OP Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 May; 7(5):309-14. PubMed ID: 8774094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Routine antenatal ultrasound in low- and middle-income countries: first look - a cluster randomised trial. Goldenberg RL; Nathan RO; Swanson D; Saleem S; Mirza W; Esamai F; Muyodi D; Garces AL; Figueroa L; Chomba E; Chiwala M; Mwenechanya M; Tshefu A; Lokangako A; Bolamba VL; Moore JL; Franklin H; Swanson J; Liechty EA; Bose CL; Krebs NF; Michael Hambidge K; Carlo WA; Kanaiza N; Naqvi F; Pineda IS; López-Gomez W; Hamsumonde D; Harrison MS; Koso-Thomas M; Miodovnik M; Wallace DD; McClure EM BJOG; 2018 Nov; 125(12):1591-1599. PubMed ID: 29782696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. First-trimester pregnancy scanning as a screening tool for high-risk and abnormal pregnancies in a district general hospital setting. Drysdale K; Ridley D; Walker K; Higgins B; Dean T J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Mar; 22(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 12521697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. RADIUS Study Group. Ewigman BG; Crane JP; Frigoletto FD; LeFevre ML; Bain RP; McNellis D N Engl J Med; 1993 Sep; 329(12):821-7. PubMed ID: 8355740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Postdates pregnancy in an indigent population: the financial burden. Fonseca L; Monga M; Silva J Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 May; 188(5):1214-6. PubMed ID: 12748482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of Introducing Routine Antenatal Ultrasound Services on Reproductive Health Indicators in Mpigi District, Central Uganda. Kawooya MG; Nathan RO; Swanson J; Swanson DL; Namulema E; Ankunda R; Kirumira F; Ddungu-Matovu P Ultrasound Q; 2015 Dec; 31(4):285-9. PubMed ID: 26656991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Routine second-trimester ultrasonography in the United States: a cost-benefit analysis. Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV; Smulian JC; Beazoglou T; Knuppel RA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Mar; 182(3):655-60. PubMed ID: 10739525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reduced costs of congenital anomalies from fetal ultrasound: are they sufficient to justify routine screening in the United States? Waitzman NJ; Romano PS Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1998 Jun; 847():141-53. PubMed ID: 9668707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]