These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8646179)

  • 41. [Objective evaluation of visual strain in computer screen and office work by recording visually evoked cortical potentials (VECP) and determining changes in contrast sensitivity and refraction].
    Pesch TW; Makropoulos W; Rozsnoki M; Einbrodt HJ; Reim M
    Ophthalmologe; 1994 Apr; 91(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 8012129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Objective measurement of contrast sensitivity using the steady-state visual evoked potential.
    Chen SA; Wu LZ; Wu DZ
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1990 Sep; 75(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 2276315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Acute laser lesion effects on acuity sweep VEPs.
    Schmeisser ET
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 Dec; 33(13):3546-54. PubMed ID: 1464500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Visual evoked potentials through night vision goggles.
    Rabin J
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1994 Apr; 65(4):345-7. PubMed ID: 8002918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A comparison of contrast sensitivity and sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates in normal humans.
    Ridder WH
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 139(3):207-219. PubMed ID: 31414313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Establishment of the sweep pattern visual evoked potential system and its application].
    Li XP; Zhang C; Hu J; Wu J; Zhu YM; Li HS
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 25(2):88-91. PubMed ID: 19537243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Steady-state pattern VEP uncorrelated with suprathreshold contrast perception.
    Strasburger H; Rentschler I; Scheidler W
    Hum Neurobiol; 1986; 5(3):209-11. PubMed ID: 3771302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Cytidine-5'-diphosphocholine improves visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and visually-evoked potentials of amblyopic subjects.
    Porciatti V; Schiavi C; Benedetti P; Baldi A; Campos EC
    Curr Eye Res; 1998 Feb; 17(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 9523091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Visual acuity measured by pattern visual evoked potential].
    Hashiba A; Tabuchi A; Matsuda E; Yamaguchi W
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1997 Aug; 101(8):644-7. PubMed ID: 9284619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of the performance of six stimulus paradigms in visual acuity assessment based on steady-state visual evoked potentials.
    Zheng X; Xu G; Wu Y; Wang Y; Du C; Wu Y; Zhang S; Han C
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2020 Dec; 141(3):237-251. PubMed ID: 32405730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. VEP-based acuity assessment in low vision.
    Hoffmann MB; Brands J; Behrens-Baumann W; Bach M
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 135(3):209-218. PubMed ID: 28980154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Test-retest reliability of swept visual evoked potential measurements of infant visual acuity and contrast sensitivity.
    Lauritzen L; Jørgensen MH; Michaelsen KF
    Pediatr Res; 2004 Apr; 55(4):701-8. PubMed ID: 14739364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Objective and quantitative assessment of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity based on steady-state motion visual evoked potentials using concentric-ring paradigm.
    Zheng X; Xu G; Wang Y; Han C; Du C; Yan W; Zhang S; Liang R
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Oct; 139(2):123-136. PubMed ID: 31214918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Assessment of visual contrast sensitivity in hyperbaric oxygen.
    Oriani G; Magni R; Michael M; Musini A; Durante A; Campagnoli P; Brancato R
    Undersea Hyperb Med; 1994 Dec; 21(4):387-90. PubMed ID: 8000278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Contrast sensitivity of the human neonate measured by the visual evoked potential.
    Atkinson J; Braddick O; French J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1979 Feb; 18(2):210-3. PubMed ID: 761974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Human VEP contrast modulation sensitivity: separation of magno- and parvocellular components.
    Nelson JI; Seiple WH
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992; 84(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 1370398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Temporal aspects of contrast visual evoked potentials in the pigmented rat: effect of dark rearing.
    Pizzorusso T; Fagiolini M; Porciatti V; Maffei L
    Vision Res; 1997 Feb; 37(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 9156170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. VEPs in humans reveal high and low spatial contrast mechanisms.
    Bobak P; Bodis-Wollner I; Harnois C; Thornton J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1984 Aug; 25(8):980-3. PubMed ID: 6746236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effects of sweep VEP parameters on visual acuity and contrast thresholds in children and adults.
    Almoqbel FM; Yadav NK; Leat SJ; Head LM; Irving EL
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Apr; 249(4):613-23. PubMed ID: 20694474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of preoperative 10-Hz visual evoked potentials to contrast sensitivity and visual acuity after cataract extraction.
    Cavender SA; Hobson RR; Chao GM; Weinstein GW; Odom JV
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1992; 81(2):181-8. PubMed ID: 1468348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.