BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8646486)

  • 1. An Equiratio Mixture Model for non-additive components: a case study for aspartame/acesulfame-K mixtures.
    Schifferstein HN
    Chem Senses; 1996 Feb; 21(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 8646486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of sweetness intensity for equiratio aspartame/sucrose mixtures.
    Schifferstein HN
    Chem Senses; 1995 Apr; 20(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 7583014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The equiratio taste mixture model successfully predicts the sensory response to the sweetness intensity of complex mixtures of sugars and sugar alcohols.
    Frijters JE; de Graaf C
    Perception; 1987; 16(5):615-28. PubMed ID: 3451190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The construction and prediction of psychophysical power functions for the sweetness of equiratio sugar mixtures.
    Frijters JE; Oude Ophuis PA
    Perception; 1983; 12(6):753-67. PubMed ID: 6678417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oral zinc sulfate solutions inhibit sweet taste perception.
    Keast RS; Canty TM; Breslin PA
    Chem Senses; 2004 Jul; 29(6):513-21. PubMed ID: 15269123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of the U and gamma' models in binary sweet taste mixtures.
    Laffort P; Walsh RM; Spillane WJ
    Chem Senses; 2002 Jul; 27(6):511-20. PubMed ID: 12142327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporal sweetness and side tastes profiles of 16 sweeteners using temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA).
    Tan VWK; Wee MSM; Tomic O; Forde CG
    Food Res Int; 2019 Jul; 121():39-47. PubMed ID: 31108762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The psychophysics of sweet taste. 7. New determination of sweet taste parameters of acesulfame, aspartame, cyclamate, saccharin, glucose and sorbitol].
    Hoppe K
    Nahrung; 1995; 39(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 7477243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Comparison of Psychophysical Dose-Response Behaviour across 16 Sweeteners.
    Wee M; Tan V; Forde C
    Nutrients; 2018 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 30400167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of sweeteners on perceived viscosity.
    Theunissen MJ; Kroeze JH
    Chem Senses; 1995 Aug; 20(4):441-50. PubMed ID: 8590029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Solution properties and sweetness response of selected bulk and intense sweeteners.
    Parke SA; Birch GG
    J Agric Food Chem; 1999 Apr; 47(4):1378-84. PubMed ID: 10563984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium.
    Dess NK; Dobson K; Roberts BT; Chapman CD
    Chem Senses; 2017 Jun; 42(5):381-392. PubMed ID: 28334357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uncoupling sweet taste and calories: comparison of the effects of glucose and three intense sweeteners on hunger and food intake.
    Rogers PJ; Carlyle JA; Hill AJ; Blundell JE
    Physiol Behav; 1988; 43(5):547-52. PubMed ID: 3200909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of various substances on the suppression of the bitterness of quinine-human gustatory sensation, binding, and taste sensor studies.
    Nakamura T; Tanigake A; Miyanaga Y; Ogawa T; Akiyoshi T; Matsuyama K; Uchida T
    Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo); 2002 Dec; 50(12):1589-93. PubMed ID: 12499596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of intense sweeteners on hunger, food intake, and body weight: a review.
    Rolls BJ
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1991 Apr; 53(4):872-8. PubMed ID: 2008866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intake of saccharin, aspartame, acesulfame K and cyclamate in Italian teenagers: present levels and projections.
    Leclercq C; Berardi D; Sorbillo MR; Lambe J
    Food Addit Contam; 1999 Mar; 16(3):99-109. PubMed ID: 10492702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acidogenicity of high-intensity sweeteners and polyols.
    Park KK; Schemehorn BR; Stookey GK; Butchko HH; Sanders PG
    Am J Dent; 1995 Feb; 8(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 7546468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensory evaluation of mixtures of maltitol or aspartame, sucrose and an orange aroma.
    Nahon DF; Roozen JP; de Graaf C
    Chem Senses; 1998 Feb; 23(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 9530970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to smooth surfaces in the presence of artificial sweeteners.
    Linke HA
    Microbios; 1983; 36(143):41-5. PubMed ID: 6843367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of carbonation on brain processing of sweet stimuli in humans.
    Di Salle F; Cantone E; Savarese MF; Aragri A; Prinster A; Nicolai E; Sarnelli G; Iengo M; Buyckx M; Cuomo R
    Gastroenterology; 2013 Sep; 145(3):537-9.e3. PubMed ID: 23714381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.