These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8646657)

  • 21. The need for standards, not guidelines, in biological data reporting and sharing.
    Burgoon LD
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Nov; 24(11):1369-73. PubMed ID: 17093486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The EQUATOR Network: promoting the transparent and accurate reporting of research.
    Morris C
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2008 Oct; 50(10):723. PubMed ID: 18834380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Recommended guidelines for reviewing, reporting, and conducting research on in-hospital resuscitation: the in-hospital "Utstein style". A statement for health care professionals from the American Heart Association, the European Resuscitation Council, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, the Australian Resuscitation Council, and the Resuscitation Councils of Southern Africa.
    Acad Emerg Med; 1997 Jun; 4(6):603-27. PubMed ID: 9189194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A user's guide to the disease management literature: recommendations for reporting and assessing program outcomes.
    Linden A; Roberts N
    Am J Manag Care; 2005 Feb; 11(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15726859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The qualitative research methodology.
    Saddler D
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2008; 31(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 18300830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Toward complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. The STARD initiative.
    Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC;
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Jan; 119(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 12520693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [The evaluation of medical research].
    Malacara JM
    Rev Invest Clin; 1997; 49(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 9707997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Chapter VII. Nonsampling bias and variance in the SRC Telephone Survey data.
    Groves RM; Magilavy LJ
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):47-50. PubMed ID: 15791756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of data from drowning: the "Utstein style".
    Idris AH; Berg RA; Bierens J; Bossaert L; Branche CM; Gabrielli A; Graves SA; Handley AJ; Hoelle R; Morley PT; Papa L; Pepe PE; Quan L; Szpilman D; Wigginton JG; Modell JH;
    Circulation; 2003 Nov; 108(20):2565-74. PubMed ID: 14623794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Making sure corrections don't vanish online.
    Shim EH; Parekh V
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7029):18; discussion 18. PubMed ID: 15744271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. SQUIRE Guidelines for reporting improvement studies in healthcare: implications for nursing publications.
    Oermann MH
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2009; 24(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 19287244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Chapter IV. The effects of respondent rules on health survey reports.
    Mathiowetz NA; Groves RM
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):26-32. PubMed ID: 15791753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How to critique qualitative research articles.
    Forchuk C; Roberts J
    Can J Nurs Res; 1993; 25(4):47-55; quiz 56. PubMed ID: 10603806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Guide for peer reviewers of scientific article].
    Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A
    Lijec Vjesn; 2005; 127(5-6):107-11. PubMed ID: 16281469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reflections on the design and reporting of STD/HIV behavioral intervention research.
    O'Leary A; DiClemente RJ; Aral SO
    AIDS Educ Prev; 1997 Feb; 9(1 Suppl):1-14. PubMed ID: 9083595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Shared responsibility in expert review of original articles].
    Shashok K
    Rev Neurol; 1997 Dec; 25(148):1946-50. PubMed ID: 9528039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analysis and reporting of clinical trials.
    Pihlstrom B
    J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 35(8):680. PubMed ID: 18727740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Inappropriate referencing in research.
    Fergusson D
    BMJ; 2009 Jul; 339():b2049. PubMed ID: 19622838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Design, execution, interpretation, and reporting of economic evaluation studies in obstetrics.
    Vintzileos AM; Beazoglou T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 191(4):1070-6. PubMed ID: 15507923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Are reporting standards of diagnostic test evaluation unrealistic?
    Lassere M
    J Rheumatol; 2010 Feb; 37(2):220-2. PubMed ID: 20147476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.