These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8647727)

  • 1. Estimating the contribution of non-sensory factors to infant-adult differences in behavioral thresholds.
    Nozza RJ
    Hear Res; 1995 Nov; 91(1-2):72-8. PubMed ID: 8647727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unmasked thresholds and minimum masking in infants and adults: separating sensory from nonsensory contributions to infant-adult differences in behavioral thresholds.
    Nozza RJ; Henson AM
    Ear Hear; 1999 Dec; 20(6):483-96. PubMed ID: 10613386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effective masking levels for bone conduction auditory steady state responses in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Hansen EE; Small SA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 21926629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Masked and unmasked pure-tone thresholds of infants and adults: development of auditory frequency selectivity and sensitivity.
    Nozza RJ; Wilson WR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Dec; 27(4):613-22. PubMed ID: 6521469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sources of auditory masking in infants: distraction effects.
    Werner LA; Bargones JY
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Nov; 50(5):405-12. PubMed ID: 1788029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between auditory brainstem response and behavioral thresholds in normal hearing infants and adults.
    Werner LA; Folsom RC; Mancl LR
    Hear Res; 1993 Jun; 68(1):131-41. PubMed ID: 8376210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparisons of auditory steady state response and behavioral air conduction and bone conduction thresholds for infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Casey KA; Small SA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):423-39. PubMed ID: 24569693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Infants' sensitivity to broadband noise.
    Werner LA; Boike K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2103-11. PubMed ID: 11386562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forward masking among infant and adult listeners.
    Werner LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Apr; 105(4):2445-53. PubMed ID: 10212425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Masking of auditory brainstem responses in young and aged gerbils.
    Boettcher FA; Mills JH; Dubno JR; Schmiedt RA
    Hear Res; 1995 Sep; 89(1-2):1-13. PubMed ID: 8600113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychophysical correlates of contralateral efferent suppression. I. The role of the medial olivocochlear system in "central masking" in nonhuman primates.
    Smith DW; Turner DA; Henson MM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Feb; 107(2):933-41. PubMed ID: 10687702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory temporal summation in infants and adults: effects of stimulus bandwidth and masking noise.
    Berg KM
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Oct; 50(4):314-20. PubMed ID: 1758763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory brainstem response latency in forward masking, a marker of sensory deficits in listeners with normal hearing thresholds.
    Mehraei G; Gallardo AP; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 346():34-44. PubMed ID: 28159652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Frequency specific auditory evoked responses. Experiments on stimulus polarity, sweep frequency, stimulus duration, notched-noise masking level, and threshold estimation in volunteers with normal hearing].
    Schönweiler R; Neumann A; Ptok M
    HNO; 2005 Nov; 53(11):983-94. PubMed ID: 16283133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple auditory steady-state response thresholds to bone-conduction stimuli in young infants with normal hearing.
    Small SA; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 16672791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maturation of the occlusion effect: a bone conduction auditory steady state response study in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Small SA; Hu N
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):708-19. PubMed ID: 21617531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relationship between auditory brainstem response latencies and behavioral thresholds in normal hearing infants and adults.
    Werner LA; Folsom RC; Mancl LR
    Hear Res; 1994 Jun; 77(1-2):88-98. PubMed ID: 7928741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.