These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8647732)

  • 1. Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. II. Changes in electrophysiological and psychophysical measures over time.
    Miller CA; Faulkner MJ; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 92(1-2):100-11. PubMed ID: 8647732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. I. Electrophysiological and psychophysical measures.
    Miller CA; Woodruff KE; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 92(1-2):85-99. PubMed ID: 8647749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to electrical stimulation in the cat. I. Absolute thresholds.
    Smith DW; Finley CC; van den Honert C; Olszyk VB; Konrad KE
    Hear Res; 1994 Dec; 81(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 7737916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates.
    Tykocinski M; Shepherd RK; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1995 Aug; 88(1-2):124-42. PubMed ID: 8575988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates: V. Effects of electrode surface area.
    Huang CQ; Shepherd RK
    Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 146(1-2):57-71. PubMed ID: 10913884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The effect of high-rate electrical stimulation on excitability of auditory nerve in Guinea pigs].
    Liu A; Wang Z; Cui Y; Zhou L; Chi F
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2005 May; 19(10):454-6, 460. PubMed ID: 16108323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of chronic high-rate electrical stimulation on the cochlea and eighth nerve in the deafened guinea pig.
    Mitchell A; Miller JM; Finger PA; Heller JW; Raphael Y; Altschuler RA
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):30-43. PubMed ID: 9083802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configuration.
    Garadat SN; Colesa DJ; Swiderski DL; Raphael Y; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 2022 Feb; 414():108404. PubMed ID: 34883366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fos-like immunoreactivity in the auditory brainstem evoked by bipolar intracochlear electrical stimulation: effects of current level and pulse duration.
    Saito H; Miller JM; Pfingst BE; Altschuler RA
    Neuroscience; 1999; 91(1):139-61. PubMed ID: 10336066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Histological and physiological effects of the central auditory prosthesis: surface versus penetrating electrodes.
    Liu X; McPhee G; Seldon HL; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 114(1-2):264-74. PubMed ID: 9447940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neurotrophin Gene Therapy in Deafened Ears with Cochlear Implants: Long-term Effects on Nerve Survival and Functional Measures.
    Pfingst BE; Colesa DJ; Swiderski DL; Hughes AP; Strahl SB; Sinan M; Raphael Y
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 18(6):731-750. PubMed ID: 28776202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cochlear implant thresholds: comparison of middle latency responses with psychophysical and cortical-spike-activity thresholds.
    Miller AL; Arenberg JG; Middlebrooks JC; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 2001 Feb; 152(1-2):55-66. PubMed ID: 11223281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses in pediatric cochlear implant users. Part I: duration effects.
    Davids T; Valero J; Papsin BC; Harrison RV; Gordon KA
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):7-14. PubMed ID: 18692121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Middle latency responses to acoustical and electrical stimulation of the cochlea in cats.
    Popelár J; Hartmann R; Syka J; Klinke R
    Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 92(1-2):63-77. PubMed ID: 8647747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal integration of short-duration pulse trains in cochlear implant listeners: Psychophysical and electrophysiological measurements.
    Macherey O; Stahl P; Intartaglia B; Meunier S; Roman S; Schön D
    Hear Res; 2021 Apr; 403():108176. PubMed ID: 33524792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of long-duration current pulses to assess nerve survival.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Robinson BK
    Hear Res; 1994 Jul; 78(1):11-26. PubMed ID: 7961173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chronic electrical stimulation does not prevent spiral ganglion cell degeneration in deafened guinea pigs.
    Agterberg MJ; Versnel H; de Groot JC; van den Broek M; Klis SF
    Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 269(1-2):169-79. PubMed ID: 20600740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Across-species comparisons of psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea: II. Strength-duration functions for single, biphasic pulses.
    Miller AL; Smith DW; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 1999 Sep; 135(1-2):47-55. PubMed ID: 10491953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation at high charge densities results in platinum dissolution but not neural loss or functional changes in vivo.
    Shepherd RK; Carter PM; Enke YL; Wise AK; Fallon JB
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Apr; 16(2):026009. PubMed ID: 30523828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.