These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8647732)

  • 41. Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Using Extracochlear Stimulation at Different Cochlear Sites: A Comparison With Intracochlear Stimulation.
    Sunwoo W; Goo W; Oh SH
    Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 May; 17(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 38273767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Postoperative objective detecting techniques for cochlear implant children with inner ear malformation.
    Qiao XF; Li X; Zhang QW; Li TL; Wang D
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Nov; 102():1-6. PubMed ID: 29106852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. I: Phase duration and stimulus duration.
    Pfingst BE; DeHaan DR; Holloway LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1857-66. PubMed ID: 1960279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration.
    Bierer JA; Middlebrooks JC
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):478-92. PubMed ID: 11784764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following acute electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates: III. Capacitive versus non-capacitive coupling of the stimulating electrodes.
    Huang CQ; Shepherd RK; Seligman PM; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1998 Feb; 116(1-2):55-64. PubMed ID: 9508028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response: refractory properties and strength-duration functions.
    Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Hear Res; 1991 Jan; 51(1):139-47. PubMed ID: 2013540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. I: Expansion of central representation.
    Snyder RL; Rebscher SJ; Cao KL; Leake PA; Kelly K
    Hear Res; 1990 Dec; 50(1-2):7-33. PubMed ID: 2076984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Detection of pulse trains in the electrically stimulated cochlea: effects of cochlear health.
    Pfingst BE; Colesa DJ; Hembrador S; Kang SY; Middlebrooks JC; Raphael Y; Su GL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):3954-68. PubMed ID: 22225050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Delayed electrical stimulation and BDNF application following induced deafness in rats.
    Song BN; Li YX; Han DM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Feb; 129(2):142-54. PubMed ID: 18607918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Relationship between EABR thresholds and levels used to program the CLARION speech processor.
    Brown CJ; Hughes ML; Lopez SM; Abbas PJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1999 Apr; 177():50-7. PubMed ID: 10214802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Morphological correlates of hearing loss after cochlear implantation and electro-acoustic stimulation in a hearing-impaired Guinea pig model.
    Reiss LA; Stark G; Nguyen-Huynh AT; Spear KA; Zhang H; Tanaka C; Li H
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():163-74. PubMed ID: 26087114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats: effects of intensity and stimulating electrode location.
    Leake PA; Snyder RL; Hradek GT; Rebscher SJ
    Hear Res; 1992 Dec; 64(1):99-117. PubMed ID: 1490906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in peripherally myelin-deficient mice.
    Zhou R; Abbas PJ; Assouline JG
    Hear Res; 1995 Aug; 88(1-2):98-106. PubMed ID: 8576009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.
    Middlebrooks JC; Bierer JA
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response to stimulation of different sites in the cochlea.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Hear Res; 1993 Apr; 66(2):130-42. PubMed ID: 8509305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? (1): On electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses.
    Guiraud J; Gallego S; Arnold L; Boyle P; Truy E; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):48-60. PubMed ID: 17157463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A clinical study of electrophysiological correlates of behavioural comfort levels in cochlear implantees.
    Raghunandhan S; Ravikumar A; Kameswaran M; Mandke K; Ranjith R
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15(3):145-60. PubMed ID: 24606544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses for lateral and medial placement of the Clarion HiFocus electrode.
    Firszt JB; Wackym PA; Gaggl W; Burg LS; Reeder RM
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 12677114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effects of electrode configuration on psychophysical strength-duration functions for single biphasic electrical stimuli in cats.
    Smith DW; Finley CC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Oct; 102(4):2228-37. PubMed ID: 9348680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Insertion trauma and recovery of function after cochlear implantation: Evidence from objective functional measures.
    Pfingst BE; Hughes AP; Colesa DJ; Watts MM; Strahl SB; Raphael Y
    Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):98-105. PubMed ID: 26209185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.