BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8647747)

  • 1. Middle latency responses to acoustical and electrical stimulation of the cochlea in cats.
    Popelár J; Hartmann R; Syka J; Klinke R
    Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 92(1-2):63-77. PubMed ID: 8647747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. I. Electrophysiological and psychophysical measures.
    Miller CA; Woodruff KE; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 92(1-2):85-99. PubMed ID: 8647749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
    Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Middle latency responses to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in unanaesthetized guinea pigs.
    Popelár J; Syka J
    Hear Res; 1993 May; 67(1-2):69-74. PubMed ID: 8340279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consequences of chronic extracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats.
    Leake PA; Snyder RL; Hradek GT; Rebscher SJ
    Hear Res; 1995 Jan; 82(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 7744715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impulse patterns of auditory nerve fibres to extra- and intracochlear electrical stimulation.
    Hartmann R; Klinke R
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():128-34. PubMed ID: 2162619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modulation of thresholds to acoustical and electrical stimulation of the intact ear in guinea pig by furosemide and noise.
    Syka J; Popelár J
    Hear Res; 1994 May; 75(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 8071135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status.
    Shepherd RK; Javel E
    Hear Res; 1997 Jun; 108(1-2):112-44. PubMed ID: 9213127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Deafened kittens.
    Shepherd RK; Matsushima J; Martin RL; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1994 Dec; 81(1-2):150-66. PubMed ID: 7737922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. I. Intensity dependence of firing rate and response latency.
    Raggio MW; Schreiner CE
    J Neurophysiol; 1994 Nov; 72(5):2334-59. PubMed ID: 7884463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response of the primary auditory cortex to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in the congenitally deaf white cat.
    Hartmann R; Shepherd RK; Heid S; Klinke R
    Hear Res; 1997 Oct; 112(1-2):115-33. PubMed ID: 9367234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates.
    Tykocinski M; Shepherd RK; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1995 Aug; 88(1-2):124-42. PubMed ID: 8575988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochlear Implant Stimulation of a Hearing Ear Generates Separate Electrophonic and Electroneural Responses.
    Sato M; Baumhoff P; Kral A
    J Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 36(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 26740649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrical and physiological changes during short-term and chronic electrical stimulation of the normal cochlea.
    Charlet de Sauvage R; Lima da Costa D; Erre JP; Aran JM
    Hear Res; 1997 Aug; 110(1-2):119-34. PubMed ID: 9282894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response.
    Firszt JB; Chambers RD; Kraus And N; Reeder RM
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):502-15. PubMed ID: 12476088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear implant use following neonatal deafness influences the cochleotopic organization of the primary auditory cortex in cats.
    Fallon JB; Irvine DR; Shepherd RK
    J Comp Neurol; 2009 Jan; 512(1):101-14. PubMed ID: 18972570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Suppression of the acoustically evoked auditory-nerve response by electrical stimulation in the cochlea of the guinea pig.
    Stronks HC; Versnel H; Prijs VF; Klis SF
    Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):64-74. PubMed ID: 19840841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of neonatal partial deafness and chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation on auditory and electrical response characteristics in primary auditory cortex.
    Fallon JB; Shepherd RK; Brown M; Irvine DR
    Hear Res; 2009 Nov; 257(1-2):93-105. PubMed ID: 19703532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extracochlear Stimulation of Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses (eABRs) Remains the Preferred Pre-implant Auditory Nerve Function Test in an Assessor-blinded Comparison.
    Causon A; O'Driscoll M; Stapleton E; Lloyd S; Freeman S; Munro KJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jan; 40(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 30489452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.