150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8648576)
1. Analysis of load transfer and stress distribution by an implant-supported fixed partial denture.
Assif D; Marshak B; Horowitz A
J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Mar; 75(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 8648576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Photoelastic stress analysis of implant-tooth connected prostheses with segmented and nonsegmented abutments.
Ochiai KT; Ozawa S; Caputo AA; Nishimura RD
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 12806328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of implant design on the stress distribution in a three-unit implant-supported distal cantilever fixed partial denture: a three-dimensional finite-element analysis.
Koka P; Mohapatra A; Anandapandian PA; Murugesan K; Vasanthakumar M
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 22945697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Photoelastic stress analysis of load transfer to implants and natural teeth comparing rigid and semirigid connectors.
Nishimura RD; Ochiai KT; Caputo AA; Jeong CM
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Jun; 81(6):696-703. PubMed ID: 10347358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of implant configurations supporting three-unit fixed partial denture on mandibular bone response: biological-data-based finite element study.
Yoda N; Liao Z; Chen J; Sasaki K; Swain M; Li Q
J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Sep; 43(9):692-701. PubMed ID: 27224022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Analysis of stress distribution of bone around the implant on vertical loads].
Shi B; Zhou ZM
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 May; 39(3):224-6. PubMed ID: 15196392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of strain at the terminal abutment site of a fixed mandibular implant prosthesis during cantilever loading.
Rodriguez AM; Aquilino SA; Lund PS; Ryther JS; Southard TE
J Prosthodont; 1993 Jun; 2(2):93-102. PubMed ID: 8242172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of implant framework and mandibular flexure on the strain distribution on a Kennedy class II mandible restored with a long-span implant fixed restoration: a pilot study.
Law C; Bennani V; Lyons K; Swain M
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24388719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses.
Kim KS; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):976-84. PubMed ID: 22010079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis.
Sertgöz A; Güvener S
J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Aug; 76(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 8820808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microstrains around standard and mini implants supporting different bridge designs.
Sallam H; Kheiralla LS; Aldawakly A
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Jun; 38(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 20712439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of cantilever length on stress transfer by implant-supported prostheses.
White SN; Caputo AA; Anderkvist T
J Prosthet Dent; 1994 May; 71(5):493-9. PubMed ID: 8006846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU
Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of implant location and length on stress distribution for three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures.
Yokoyama S; Wakabayashi N; Shiota M; Ohyama T
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Mar; 91(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 15060492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Finite element analysis on dental implant-supported prostheses without passive fit.
Kunavisarut C; Lang LA; Stoner BR; Felton DA
J Prosthodont; 2002 Mar; 11(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 11935508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An In Vivo Study on Load Distribution in Different Implant Configurations for Supporting Fixed Partial Dentures.
Kobari H; Yoda N; Chen J; Kawata T; Sasaki K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1049-57. PubMed ID: 27632259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On occlusal forces in dentitions with implant-supported fixed cantilever prostheses.
Falk H
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1990; 69():1-40. PubMed ID: 2196708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: A three-dimensional finite element study.
Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A; Sevimay M; Soykan E; Unsal E
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Feb; 91(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 14970760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Functional loads on freestanding and connected implants in three-unit mandibular prostheses opposing complete dentures: an in vivo study.
Gunne J; Rangert B; Glantz PO; Svensson A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(3):335-41. PubMed ID: 9197098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different implant configurations for a mandibular fixed prosthesis.
Fazi G; Tellini S; Vangi D; Branchi R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):752-9. PubMed ID: 21841984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
