153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8650560)
1. Merit, quality, and the SBIR program.
Whalen RL
Science; 1996 Jun; 272(5269):1725. PubMed ID: 8650560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. SBIR program. Researchers fight against bigger slice to small business.
Mervis J
Science; 2009 Jul; 325(5936):18. PubMed ID: 19574355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Merit, quality, and the SBIR.
Bradshaw RA
Science; 1996 Jun; 272(5269):1723. PubMed ID: 8650556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Merit, quality, and the SBIR.
Laughlin R
Science; 1996 Jun; 272(5269):1724-5. PubMed ID: 8650559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Merit, quality, and the SBIR program.
Baron J
Science; 1996 Jun; 272(5269):1723-4. PubMed ID: 8650558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. 2003 budget. War effort shapes U.S. budget, with some program casualties.
Malakoff D
Science; 2002 Feb; 295(5557):952-4. PubMed ID: 11834796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. National Institutes of Health. Panel weighs starter R01 grants.
Kaiser J
Science; 2004 Jun; 304(5679):1891. PubMed ID: 15218117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. U.S. budget. Budgets in brief.
Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5919):1275. PubMed ID: 19264989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. U.S. research capacity. A controversial IDeA to shrink the biomedical gap.
Mervis J
Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5538):2195-6. PubMed ID: 11567121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. NIH retains research funds for the future.
Macilwain C
Nature; 1996 Nov; 384(6606):203. PubMed ID: 8918864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. U.S. research spending. Scientists feel the pain as 2007 budget outlook grows dark.
Mervis J
Science; 2006 Dec; 314(5806):1666-7. PubMed ID: 17170258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Research squeeze.
Steele MW
Nature; 1994 Sep; 371(6494):194. PubMed ID: 8078576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. National Institutes of Health. Two strikes and you're out, grant applicants learn.
Kaiser J
Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5900):358. PubMed ID: 18927363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. US Congressmen in bid for medical funds.
Gershon D
Nature; 1994 Mar; 368(6466):3. PubMed ID: 8107880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Startups hope federal study fixes SBIR flaws.
Basu P
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Jun; 22(6):644. PubMed ID: 15175671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. National Institutes of Health phase I, Small Business Innovation Research applications: fiscal year 1983 results.
Vener KJ
Fed Proc; 1985 Aug; 44(11):2679-84. PubMed ID: 4018273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. NIH funding: what does the future look like?
Avantaggiati ML
Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5822):198-200; author reply 198-200. PubMed ID: 17436448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. NIH funding: what does the future look like?
Furcht LT
Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5822):198-200; author reply 198-200. PubMed ID: 17431152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. U.S. budget. Amid the gloom, researchers prepare for a boom in funding.
Mervis J
Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5919):1274-5. PubMed ID: 19264988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. One for the money.
Mandavilli A
Nat Med; 2005 Jun; 11(6):587-8. PubMed ID: 15937461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
