These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8650565)

  • 1. Scientific misconduct. HHS is still looking for a definition.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1996 Jun; 272(5269):1735. PubMed ID: 8650565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Commission proposes new definition of misconduct.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1995 Sep; 269(5232):1811. PubMed ID: 7569910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A judgement fit for prime time.
    Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):717. PubMed ID: 8657262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clearing of researcher in 'Baltimore affair' boosts demand for reforms.
    Steele F
    Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):719-20. PubMed ID: 8657264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scientific misconduct. Panel urges new approach to inquiries.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1995 Dec; 270(5241):1431. PubMed ID: 7491482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advisory committee urges changes at OSI.
    Gibbons A
    Science; 1991 Nov; 254(5036):1287-8. PubMed ID: 1962186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An end to fraud?
    Nature; 1993 Nov; 366(6451):95-6. PubMed ID: 8232562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spring helps research integrity report resurface.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1996 Mar; 275(10):746. PubMed ID: 8598578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The definition of misconduct in science: a view from NSF.
    Buzzelli DE
    Science; 1993 Jan; 259(5095):584-5, 647-8. PubMed ID: 8430300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Appeals board exonerates Baltimore, Imanishi-Kari.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1996 Jul 24-31; 276(4):266. PubMed ID: 8656524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The fraud case that evaporated.
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11647106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noted finding of science fraud is overturned by a federal panel.
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():1, 20. PubMed ID: 11647108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The federal research misconduct regulations as viewed from the research universities.
    Wright DE
    Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):249-72. PubMed ID: 11656759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Misconduct charges dropped against AIDS virus scientist.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():1, 11. PubMed ID: 11647009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 'Fraud police' face dilemma over warning medical boards.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1996 Feb; 379(6565):480. PubMed ID: 8596620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Appeals panel reverses fraud finding.
    Fackelmann K
    Sci News; 1996 Jul; 150(1):4. PubMed ID: 11654356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scientific reasoning and due process.
    Guenin LM; Davis BD
    Sci Eng Ethics; 1996 Jan; 2(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 11657786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scientific misconduct. Ill-defined, redefined.
    Palca J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(5):4. PubMed ID: 8891701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 'Unrealistic' misconduct plans under fire.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1996 May; 381(6580):263. PubMed ID: 8692255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.