These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

533 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8651115)

  • 1. Value of programmed ventricular stimulation in predicting sudden death and sustained ventricular tachycardia in survivors of acute myocardial infarction.
    Zoni-Berisso M; Molini D; Mela GS; Vecchio C
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 77(9):673-80. PubMed ID: 8651115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of late arrhythmic events after acute myocardial infarction from combined use of noninvasive prognostic variables and inducibility of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia.
    Pedretti R; Etro MD; Laporta A; Sarzi Braga S; Carù B
    Am J Cardiol; 1993 May; 71(13):1131-41. PubMed ID: 8480637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Programmed ventricular stimulation in survivors of acute myocardial infarction: long-term follow-up.
    Brembilla-Perrot B; de la Chaise AT; Briançon S; Suty-Selton C; Beurrier D; Martin N; Thiel B; Louis P; Danchin N
    Int J Cardiol; 1995 Mar; 49(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 7607767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The prognostic stratification of the risk of sudden death and sustained ventricular tachycardia after an acute myocardial infarct: which patients should undergo programmed ventricular stimulation?].
    Berisso MZ; Molini D; Camerini A; Mela GS; Vecchio C
    G Ital Cardiol; 1994 May; 24(5):503-15. PubMed ID: 8076728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prognostic significance of programmed ventricular stimulation in patients surviving complicated acute myocardial infarction: a prospective study.
    Bhandari AK; Widerhorn J; Sager PT; Leon C; Hong R; Kotlewski A; Hackett J; Rahimtoola SH
    Am Heart J; 1992 Jul; 124(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 1615832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Results of systematic programmed ventricular stimulation after myocardial infarction. Which protocol should be recommended?].
    Brembilla-Perrot B; de La Chaise AT; Beurrier D; Martin N; Thiel B; Suty-Selton C; Louis P
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1993 Oct; 86(10):1453-7. PubMed ID: 8010843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prevalence, characteristics and prognostic value during long-term follow-up of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era.
    Hohnloser SH; Klingenheben T; Zabel M; Schöpperl M; Mauss O
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Jun; 33(7):1895-902. PubMed ID: 10362190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Amiodarone therapy for sustained ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction: long-term follow-up, risk assessment and predictive value of programmed ventricular stimulation.
    Maury P; Zimmermann M; Metzger J; Reynard C; Dorsaz P; Adamec R
    Int J Cardiol; 2000; 76(2-3):199-210. PubMed ID: 11104875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk stratification and management of patients with organic heart disease and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia: role of programmed stimulation, left ventricular ejection fraction, and the signal-averaged electrocardiogram.
    Turitto G; Fontaine JM; Ursell S; Caref EB; Bekheit S; el-Sherif N
    Am J Med; 1990 Jan; 88(1N):35N-41N. PubMed ID: 2368762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Programmed ventricular stimulation after myocardial infarction does not help reduce the risk of ventricular events.
    Brembilla-Perrot B; Jacquemin L; Terrier de la Chaise A; Beurrier D
    Cardiovasc Drugs Ther; 1996 Nov; 10(5):549-56. PubMed ID: 8950069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognosis of patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia and of survivors of cardiac arrest not inducible by programmed stimulation.
    Andresen D; Steinbeck G; Brüggemann T; Haberl R; Fink L; Schröder R
    Am J Cardiol; 1992 Nov; 70(15):1250-4. PubMed ID: 1442574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inducibility of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia as a prognostic indicator in survivors of recent myocardial infarction: a prospective evaluation in relation to other prognostic variables.
    Cripps T; Bennett ED; Camm AJ; Ward DE
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1989 Aug; 14(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 2754119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Programmed ventricular stimulation for arrhythmia risk prediction in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia.
    Grimm W; Hoffmann J; Menz V; Luck K; Maisch B
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1998 Sep; 32(3):739-45. PubMed ID: 9741521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noninvasive prediction of sudden death and sustained ventricular tachycardia after acute myocardial infarction using a neural network algorithm.
    Zoni-Berisso M; Molini D; Viani S; Mela GS; Delfino L
    Ital Heart J; 2001 Aug; 2(8):612-20. PubMed ID: 11577836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Value of programmed ventricular stimulation for prophylactic internal cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in postinfarction patients preselected by noninvasive risk stratifiers.
    Schmitt C; Barthel P; Ndrepepa G; Schreieck J; Plewan A; Schömig A; Schmidt G
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2001 Jun; 37(7):1901-7. PubMed ID: 11401129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of sudden death and spontaneous ventricular tachycardia in survivors of complicated myocardial infarction: value of the response to programmed stimulation using a maximum of three ventricular extrastimuli.
    Waspe LE; Seinfeld D; Ferrick A; Kim SG; Matos JA; Fisher JD
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Jun; 5(6):1292-301. PubMed ID: 2582016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Induction of ventricular fibrillation predicts sudden death in patients treated with amiodarone because of ventricular tachyarrhythmias after a myocardial infarction.
    Rodríguez LM; Sternick EB; Smeets JL; Timmermans C; den Dulk K; Oreto G; Wellens HJ
    Heart; 1996 Jan; 75(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 8624866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Routine programmed electrical stimulation in survivors of acute myocardial infarction for prediction of spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias during follow-up: results, optimal stimulation protocol and cost-effective screening.
    Bourke JP; Richards DA; Ross DL; Wallace EM; McGuire MA; Uther JB
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Sep; 18(3):780-8. PubMed ID: 1907984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Usefulness of early versus late programmed ventricular stimulation in acute myocardial infarction.
    Nogami A; Aonuma K; Takahashi A; Nitta J; Chun YH; Iesaka Y; Hiroe M; Marumo F
    Am J Cardiol; 1991 Jul; 68(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 2058550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Right ventricular dysfunction predisposes to inducible ventricular tachycardia at electrophysiology studies in patients with acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.
    Thakkar JB; Zaman S; Byth K; Narayan A; Thiagalingam A; Chow C; Thomas SP; Sivagangabalan G; Farlow D; Barnett R; Kovoor P
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2014 Oct; 7(5):898-905. PubMed ID: 25108742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.