These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8653094)

  • 21. Retrieval dynamics in recognition and list discrimination: further evidence of separate processes of familiarity and recall.
    Hintzman DL; Caulton DA; Levitin DJ
    Mem Cognit; 1998 May; 26(3):449-62. PubMed ID: 9610117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Levels-of-processing effects on context and target recollection for words and pictures.
    Nieznański M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Sep; 209():103127. PubMed ID: 32603912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Contribution of familiarity and recollection to associative recognition memory: insights from event-related potentials.
    Opitz B; Cornell S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 18(9):1595-605. PubMed ID: 16989559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Free recall test experience potentiates strategy-driven effects of value on memory.
    Cohen MS; Rissman J; Hovhannisyan M; Castel AD; Knowlton BJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1581-1601. PubMed ID: 28394160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Recollection and familiarity in hippocampal amnesia.
    Turriziani P; Serra L; Fadda L; Caltagirone C; Carlesimo GA
    Hippocampus; 2008; 18(5):469-80. PubMed ID: 18306303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Exploring the role of attention during memory retrieval: effects of semantic encoding and divided attention.
    Lozito JP; Mulligan NW
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):986-98. PubMed ID: 17128598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Remembering and knowing: electrophysiological distinctions at encoding but not retrieval.
    Voss JL; Paller KA
    Neuroimage; 2009 May; 46(1):280-9. PubMed ID: 19457375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Recollection and familiarity for words and faces: a study comparing Remember-Know judgements and the Process Dissociation Procedure.
    Espinosa-García M; Vaquero JM; Milliken B; Tudela P
    Memory; 2017 Jan; 25(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 26695108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Can color changes alter the neural correlates of recognition memory? Manipulation of processing affects an electrophysiological indicator of conceptual implicit memory.
    Cui X; Gao C; Zhou J; Guo C
    Neuroreport; 2016 Sep; 27(14):1037-45. PubMed ID: 27489100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Investigating the mixture and subdivision of perceptual and conceptual processing in Japanese memory tests.
    Gabeza R
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Mar; 23(2):155-65. PubMed ID: 7731361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Signal-detection, threshold, and dual-process models of recognition memory: ROCs and conscious recollection.
    Yonelinas AP; Dobbins I; Szymanski MD; Dhaliwal HS; King L
    Conscious Cogn; 1996 Dec; 5(4):418-41. PubMed ID: 9063609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Automatic processing influences free recall: converging evidence from the process dissociation procedure and remember-know judgments.
    McCabe DP; Roediger HL; Karpicke JD
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Apr; 39(3):389-402. PubMed ID: 21264598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Recollection and familiarity in negative schizophrenia.
    Thoma P; Zoppelt D; Wiebel B; Daum I
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(3):430-5. PubMed ID: 15993449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The role of recollection and familiarity in the context variability mirror effect.
    Cook GI; Marsh RL; Hicks JL
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):240-50. PubMed ID: 16752588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Isolating the contributions of familiarity and source information to item recognition: a time course analysis.
    McElree B; Dolan PO; Jacoby LL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 May; 25(3):563-82. PubMed ID: 10368927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of familiarity and recollection in the false fame paradigm using a modified process dissociation procedure.
    Mayes AR; Van Eijk R; Isaac CL
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 1995 Sep; 1(5):469-82. PubMed ID: 9375232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ironic effects of repetition: measuring age-related differences in memory.
    Jacoby LL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jan; 25(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 9949705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Familiarity, but not recollection, supports the between-subject production effect in recognition memory.
    Fawcett JM; Ozubko JD
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):99-115. PubMed ID: 27244352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity.
    Curran T
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Sep; 28(6):923-38. PubMed ID: 11105518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. What's the gist? The influence of schemas on the neural correlates underlying true and false memories.
    Webb CE; Turney IC; Dennis NA
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt A):61-75. PubMed ID: 27697593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.