These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8653094)

  • 81. Electrophysiological signals associated with fluency of different levels of processing reveal multiple contributions to recognition memory.
    Li B; Taylor JR; Wang W; Gao C; Guo C
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Aug; 53():1-13. PubMed ID: 28558307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Neural correlates of familiarity and conceptual fluency in a recognition test with ancient pictographic characters.
    Hou M; Safron A; Paller KA; Guo C
    Brain Res; 2013 Jun; 1518():48-60. PubMed ID: 23632379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Stimulus exposure time and perceptual memory.
    von Hippel W; Hawkins C
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Nov; 56(5):525-35. PubMed ID: 7991350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Old processes, new perspectives: Familiarity is correlated with (not independent of) recollection and is more (not equally) variable for targets than for lures.
    Moran R; Goshen-Gottstein Y
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 Jun; 79():40-67. PubMed ID: 25899705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Endogenous versus exogenous attentional cuing effects on memory.
    Hauer BJ; MacLeod CM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):305-20. PubMed ID: 16458848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Fast, but not slow, familiarity is preserved in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment.
    Besson G; Ceccaldi M; Tramoni E; Felician O; Didic M; Barbeau EJ
    Cortex; 2015 Apr; 65():36-49. PubMed ID: 25618326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. The disruptive effects of processing fluency on familiarity-based recognition in amnesia.
    Ozubko JD; Yonelinas AP
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Feb; 54():59-67. PubMed ID: 24361540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Conceptual masking: the effects of subsequent visual events on memory for pictures.
    Intraub H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1984 Jan; 10(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 6242731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Recognition memory for faces: when familiarity supports associative recognition judgments.
    Yonelinas AP; Kroll NE; Dobbins IG; Soltani M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1999 Dec; 6(4):654-61. PubMed ID: 10682209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Impaired assessment of cumulative lifetime familiarity for object concepts after left anterior temporal-lobe resection that includes perirhinal cortex but spares the hippocampus.
    Bowles B; Duke D; Rosenbaum RS; McRae K; Köhler S
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Sep; 90():170-9. PubMed ID: 27378441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Attention and implicit memory tests: the effects of varying attentional load on conceptual priming.
    Mulligan NW
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Jan; 25(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9046866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. The Role of Recollection and Familiarity in Nondemented Parkinson's Patients.
    Pitarque A; Melendez JC; Sales A; Satorres E; Escudero J; Algarabel S
    J Gen Psychol; 2017; 144(3):230-243. PubMed ID: 28722546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Familiarity and recollection produce distinct eye movement, pupil and medial temporal lobe responses when memory strength is matched.
    Kafkas A; Montaldi D
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Nov; 50(13):3080-93. PubMed ID: 22902538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Hippocampal involvement in recollection but not familiarity across time: a prospective study.
    Suchan B; Gayk AE; Schmid G; Köster O; Daum I
    Hippocampus; 2008; 18(1):92-8. PubMed ID: 17932973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Mechanisms underlying priming on perceptual tests.
    Weldon MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 May; 17(3):526-41. PubMed ID: 1829476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Recollection is fast and slow.
    Brainerd CJ; Nakamura K; Lee WA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):302-319. PubMed ID: 29698044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Assessing the influence of recollection and familiarity in memory for own- versus other-race faces.
    Marcon JL; Susa KJ; Meissner CA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 19145017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. A model for conceptual processing of naturalistic scenes.
    Hanna A; Loftus G
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1993 Sep; 47(3):548-69. PubMed ID: 8293020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Processing fluency affects subjective claims of recollection.
    Kurilla BP; Westerman DL
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Jan; 36(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 18323065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. The role of extralist associations in false remembering: a source misattribution account.
    McCabe DP; Geraci L
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Mar; 37(2):130-42. PubMed ID: 19223563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.