These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8653473)

  • 1. Effects of tomographic motion, slice thickness, and object thickness on film density.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Mar; 81(3):368-73. PubMed ID: 8653473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The accuracy of an x-ray film quality-assurance step-wedge test.
    Bloxom RM; Manson-Hing LR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Oct; 62(4):449-58. PubMed ID: 3464919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 1: phantom validity.
    Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 9927090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychophysical properties of a new F-speed intraoral film.
    Mastoris M; Yoshiura K; Welander U; Tsiklakis K; Papadakis E; Li G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 May; 33(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 15371315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Niobium filtration of conventional and high-frequency x-ray generator beams for intraoral radiography. Effects on absorbed doses, image density and contrast, and photon spectra.
    Tetradis S; Scaf G; Lurie AG; Freedman ML
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Aug; 80(2):232-41. PubMed ID: 7552890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variations in film exposure, effective kVp, and HVL among thirty-five dental x-ray units.
    Preece JW; Jensen CW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Dec; 56(6):655-61. PubMed ID: 6581465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative determination of radio-opacity: equivalence of digital and film X-ray systems.
    Nomoto R; Mishima A; Kobayashi K; McCabe JF; Darvell BW; Watts DC; Momoi Y; Hirano S
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jan; 24(1):141-7. PubMed ID: 17923153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of independent film and object rotation on projective geometric standardization of dental radiographs.
    Fisher E; van der Stelt PF; Ostuni J; Dunn SM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 8593908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Technical note: measurement of computed tomography scanner slice widths.
    Czajka J; Shaw AJ; Mott DJ
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Feb; 67(794):200-2. PubMed ID: 8130984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation dosimetry in tomography of the teeth and jaws using a multi-film cassette.
    Borglin K; Petersson A; Rohlin M; Thapper K
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1985; 26(6):739-43. PubMed ID: 4083070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extraoral radiographic imaging of primary caries.
    Clifton TL; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 9780894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
    Ekestubbe A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Critical review of tomography in radiology and nuclear medicine.
    Freedman GS; Putman CE; Potter GD
    CRC Crit Rev Clin Radiol Nucl Med; 1975 Apr; 6(2):253-94. PubMed ID: 168033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of heart rate, slice thickness, and calcification density on calcium scores using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography: a systematic phantom study.
    Groen JM; Greuter MJ; Schmidt B; Suess C; Vliegenthart R; Oudkerk M
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Dec; 42(12):848-55. PubMed ID: 18007157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of gray level discretization on radiomic feature stability for different CT scanners, tube currents and slice thicknesses: a comprehensive phantom study.
    Larue RTHM; van Timmeren JE; de Jong EEC; Feliciani G; Leijenaar RTH; Schreurs WMJ; Sosef MN; Raat FHPJ; van der Zande FHR; Das M; van Elmpt W; Lambin P
    Acta Oncol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):1544-1553. PubMed ID: 28885084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effective exposure angle for spiral and hypocycloidal motion in tomography.
    Spiegler P; Moler CL
    Radiology; 1973 Jul; 108(1):173-9. PubMed ID: 4709029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of x-ray tube motion on dental radiographic resolution.
    Clark DE; Zalsman H
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Feb; 71(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 2003019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance evaluation of X-ray computed tomography "TCT-700S".
    Yamamoto K; Hayakawa Y; Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Ueno H; Harada K; Makihara M; Ohta Y; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1990 May; 31(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 2131167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interrelationship between cross-sectional and sagittal imaging in computer-assisted dental implant tomography.
    Thunthy KH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 10808217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.