BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8653485)

  • 1. Estimating the rate of adverse drug reactions with capture-recapture analysis.
    Seeger JD; Schumock GT; Kong SX
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 1996 Jan; 53(2):178-81. PubMed ID: 8653485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. FDA's sentinel network: a monumental task.
    Young D
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2007 Apr; 64(8):800-1. PubMed ID: 17420189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computerized surveillance for adverse drug events in a pediatric hospital.
    Kilbridge PM; Noirot LA; Reichley RM; Heard KM; Dunagan WC; Bailey TC
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2008 Nov; ():1004. PubMed ID: 18998917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Use of the capture-recapture method to assess the frequency of "serious" adverse drug reactions: experience of Toulouse University Hospital].
    Montastruc JL; Lugardon S; Desboeuf K; Fernet P; Lapeyre-Mestre M
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2008 Feb; 192(2):421-30; discussion 430-1. PubMed ID: 18819693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adverse drug event trigger tool: a practical methodology for measuring medication related harm.
    Rozich JD; Haraden CR; Resar RK
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2003 Jun; 12(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 12792009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Canadian Pharmacogenomics Network for Drug Safety: a model for safety pharmacology.
    Ross CJ; Visscher H; Sistonen J; Brunham LR; Pussegoda K; Loo TT; Rieder MJ; Koren G; Carleton BC; Hayden MR;
    Thyroid; 2010 Jul; 20(7):681-7. PubMed ID: 20578893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Natural language processing to identify adverse drug events.
    Gysbers M; Reichley R; Kilbridge PM; Noirot L; Nagarajan R; Dunagan WC; Bailey TC
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2008 Nov; ():961. PubMed ID: 18999130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. IOM panel mulls over adverse-event reporting.
    Young D
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2005 Dec; 62(24):2590-1. PubMed ID: 16333055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using a capture-recapture method to assess the frequency of adverse drug reactions in a French university hospital.
    Lugardon S; Desboeuf K; Fernet P; Montastruc JL; Lapeyre-Mestre M
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2006 Aug; 62(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 16842398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The missing link? Using EHRs to extract data on adverse drug events.
    Robeznieks A
    Mod Healthc; 2007 Feb; 37(7):34. PubMed ID: 17432260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experience with an adverse drug reaction reporting program in a neurology specialty clinic.
    Ryan M; Gora-Harper ML; Caldwell F
    Ann Pharmacother; 2002 Feb; 36(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 11847939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Could we improve notification of adverse drugs reactions in hospital? Assessment of 5 years of network PharmacoMIP's activities].
    Jacquot J; Gony M; Baudrin D; Chastel X; Montastruc JL; Bagheri H
    Therapie; 2012; 67(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 22874489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recognizing, reporting, and reducing adverse drug reactions.
    Brown SD; Landry FJ
    South Med J; 2001 Apr; 94(4):370-3. PubMed ID: 11332899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monitoring and managing adverse drug reactions.
    Fincham JE
    Am Pharm; 1992 Feb; NS32(2):74-81. PubMed ID: 1546634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Data mining differential clinical outcomes associated with drug regimens using adverse event reporting data.
    Sarangdhar M; Tabar S; Schmidt C; Kushwaha A; Shah K; Dahlquist JE; Jegga AG; Aronow BJ
    Nat Biotechnol; 2016 Jul; 34(7):697-700. PubMed ID: 27404875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of patient reporting of adverse drug reactions to the UK 'Yellow Card Scheme': literature review, descriptive and qualitative analyses, and questionnaire surveys.
    Avery AJ; Anderson C; Bond CM; Fortnum H; Gifford A; Hannaford PC; Hazell L; Krska J; Lee AJ; McLernon DJ; Murphy E; Shakir S; Watson MC
    Health Technol Assess; 2011 May; 15(20):1-234, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 21545758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human factors and medical IT systems: complex incident reporting systems and multiple IV infusions.
    Colvin C; Baird P; Easty T; Trbovich P
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2013; Suppl():59-63. PubMed ID: 24111773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early identification of adverse drug reactions from search log data.
    White RW; Wang S; Pant A; Harpaz R; Shukla P; Sun W; DuMouchel W; Horvitz E
    J Biomed Inform; 2016 Feb; 59():42-8. PubMed ID: 26610385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of adverse drug reactions detected by pharmacy and medical records departments.
    Johnstone DM; Kirking DM; Vinson BE
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 1995 Feb; 52(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 7749958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comprehensive intervention for adverse drug reactions identification and reporting in a Pediatric Emergency Department.
    Morales Ríos O; Jasso Gutiérrez L; Talavera JO; Téllez-Rojo MM; Olivar López V; Garduño Espinosa J; Muñoz Hernández O
    Int J Clin Pharm; 2016 Feb; 38(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 26499501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.