BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8653900)

  • 1. Three routine methods for measuring high-density lipoprotein cholesterol compared with the Reference Method.
    Harris N; Galpchian V; Rifai N
    Clin Chem; 1996 May; 42(5):738-43. PubMed ID: 8653900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new precipitation method with magnetic separation for high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol assay.
    Iida S; Osawa S; Yonemitsu H
    Clin Chim Acta; 1994 Aug; 228(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 7988030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New immunoseparation-based homogeneous assay for HDL-cholesterol compared with three homogeneous and two heterogeneous methods for HDL-cholesterol.
    Nauck M; März W; Wieland H
    Clin Chem; 1998 Jul; 44(7):1443-51. PubMed ID: 9665422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three generations of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol assays compared with ultracentrifugation/dextran sulfate-Mg2+ method.
    Harris N; Galpchian V; Thomas J; Iannotti E; Law T; Rifai N
    Clin Chem; 1997 May; 43(5):816-23. PubMed ID: 9166236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Homogeneous HDL-cholesterol assay versus ultracentrifugation/dextran sulfate-Mg2+ precipitation and dextran sulfate-Mg2+ precipitation in healthy population and in hemodialysis patients.
    Bairaktari E; Elisaf M; Katsaraki A; Tsimihodimos V; Tselepis AD; Siamopoulos KC; Tsolas O
    Clin Biochem; 1999 Jul; 32(5):339-46. PubMed ID: 10480448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Precipitation methods for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol measurement compared, and final evaluation under routine operating conditions of a method with a low sample-to-reagent ratio.
    Demacker PN; Hessels M; Toenhake-Dijkstra H; Baadenhuijsen H
    Clin Chem; 1997 Apr; 43(4):663-8. PubMed ID: 9105270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of five different high-density lipoprotein cholesterol assays: the most precise are not the most accurate.
    de Keijzer MH; Elbers D; Baadenhuijsen H; Demacker PN
    Ann Clin Biochem; 1999 Mar; 36 ( Pt 2)():168-75. PubMed ID: 10370732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. HDL cholesterol quantitation by phosphotungstate-Mg2+ and by dextran sulfate-Mn2+-polyethylene glycol precipitation, both with enzymic cholesterol assay compared with the lipid research method.
    Warnick GR; Mayfield C; Benderson J; Chen JS; Albers JJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1982 Nov; 78(5):718-23. PubMed ID: 6182791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of two homogeneous methods for measuring high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
    Huang YC; Kao JT; Tsai KS
    Clin Chem; 1997 Jun; 43(6 Pt 1):1048-55. PubMed ID: 9191560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of different analytical and precipitation methods for direct estimation of serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
    Penttilä IM; Voutilainen E; Laitinen P; Juutilainen P
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1981 Jun; 41(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 6171860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reference standardization and triglyceride interference of a new homogeneous HDL-cholesterol assay compared with a former chemical precipitation assay.
    Cobbaert C; Zwang L; Ceriotti F; Modenese A; Cremer P; Herrmann W; Hoss G; Jarausch J; Türk R; März W; Nauck M
    Clin Chem; 1998 Apr; 44(4):779-89. PubMed ID: 9554489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dextran sulfate complexes with potassium phosphate to interfere in determinations of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
    Olmos JM; Lasunción MA; Herrera E
    Clin Chem; 1992 Feb; 38(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 1541006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Multicenter evaluation on different analyzers of three methods for direct HDL-cholesterol assay].
    Egloff M; Léglise D; Duvillard L; Steinmetz J; Boyer MJ; Ruelland A; Agher R; Beucler I
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1999; 57(5):561-72. PubMed ID: 10518058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Homogeneous assay for direct determination of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol evaluated.
    Nauck M; März W; Haas B; Wieland H
    Clin Chem; 1996 Mar; 42(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 8598107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of total HDL, HDL2 and HDL3 by dextran sulfate-MgCl2 precipitation technique in human serum.
    Talameh Y; Wei R; Naito H
    Clin Chim Acta; 1986 Jul; 158(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 2427262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modification of the dextran-Mg2+ high-density lipoprotein cholesterol precipitation method for use with previously frozen plasma.
    McNamara JR; Huang C; Massov T; Leary ET; Warnick GR; Rubins HB; Robins SJ; Schaefer EJ
    Clin Chem; 1994 Feb; 40(2):233-9. PubMed ID: 7508829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Six methods for isolating high-density lipoprotein compared, with use of the reference method for quantifying cholesterol in serum.
    Wiebe DA; Smith SJ
    Clin Chem; 1985 May; 31(5):746-50. PubMed ID: 3987003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Studies of the accuracy of measurements of serum high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.
    Clark DA; Garcia NJ; Rozell PR; Mosser EL
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1984 Oct; 55(10):941-5. PubMed ID: 6208892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Artifactual reduction of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol estimates after dextran sulfate--Mg2+ precipitation.
    Henderson LO; LaGarde E; Herbert PN
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1980 May; 73(5):664-8. PubMed ID: 6155066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of predispensed reagent and noncentrifugation methods for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol measurement.
    Zhang DJ; LaRue S; Miller WG; Cole TG
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Sep; 121(9):938-47. PubMed ID: 9302925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.