These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Tolerance to visual defocus. Legge GE; Mullen KT; Woo GC; Campbell FW J Opt Soc Am A; 1987 May; 4(5):851-63. PubMed ID: 3598739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of Stiles-Crawford apodization on visual acuity. Atchison DA; Scott DH; Strang NC; Artal P J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2002 Jun; 19(6):1073-83. PubMed ID: 12049344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Through-focus performance with multifocal contact lenses: effect of binocularity, pupil diameter and inherent ocular aberrations. Plainis S; Ntzilepis G; Atchison DA; Charman WN Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jan; 33(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 23199097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The refractive status and vision profile: a questionnaire to measure vision-related quality of life in persons with refractive error. Vitale S; Schein OD; Meinert CL; Steinberg EP Ophthalmology; 2000 Aug; 107(8):1529-39. PubMed ID: 10919904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of blur and subsequent adaptation on visual acuity using letter and Landolt C charts: differences between emmetropes and myopes. Poulere E; Moschandreas J; Kontadakis GA; Pallikaris IG; Plainis S Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 23297779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of localized defocus on detection thresholds for different sized targets in the fovea and periphery. Anderson RS; McDowell DR; Ennis FA Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2001 Feb; 79(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 11167290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Aliasing for rapidly counterphasing stimuli: a failure to demonstrate an M-cell sampling limit to resolution. McKendrick AM; Johnson CA J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2000 Oct; 17(10):1703-12. PubMed ID: 11028518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Relationship between acuity for gratings and for tumbling-E letters in peripheral vision. Anderson RS; Thibos LN J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1999 Oct; 16(10):2321-33. PubMed ID: 10517018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Investigation of the impact of blur under mobile attentional orientation using a vision simulator. De Lestrange-Anginieur E; Kee CS PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234380. PubMed ID: 32542032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impact of temporal fluctuations in optical defocus on visual acuity: Empirical results and modeling outcomes. Goswami S; Bharadwaj SR J Vis; 2023 Mar; 23(3):14. PubMed ID: 36971683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of refractive error in visual tests with sinusoidal gratings. Charman WN Br J Physiol Opt; 1979; 33(2):10-20. PubMed ID: 554724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Vision-Related Quality of Life and Perception of Military Readiness and Capabilities Following Refractive Surgery Among Active Duty U.S. Military Service Members. Sia RK; Ryan DS; Rivers BA; Logan LA; Eaddy JB; Peppers L; Rodgers SB J Refract Surg; 2018 Sep; 34(9):597-603. PubMed ID: 30199563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of blur adaptation on human parafoveal vision. Mankowska A; Aziz K; Cufflin MP; Whitaker D; Mallen EA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Mar; 53(3):1145-50. PubMed ID: 22323485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Correspondence between visual acuity, refractive error, and the speed of visual perception. EAMES TH Br J Ophthalmol; 1953 May; 37(5):312-3. PubMed ID: 13042027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Is the Cardiff Acuity Test effective in detecting refractive errors in children? Howard C; Firth AY Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):577-81. PubMed ID: 16909076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Ocular defocus, spurious resolution and contrast reversal. Smith G Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1982; 2(1):5-23. PubMed ID: 7088556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]