These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8654326)

  • 41. The Malmö Food Study: validity of two dietary assessment methods for measuring nutrient intake.
    Riboli E; Elmståhl S; Saracci R; Gullberg B; Lindgärde F
    Int J Epidemiol; 1997; 26 Suppl 1():S161-73. PubMed ID: 9126544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Applicability of the dietary record by cooked dishes method for estimating dietary intake of populations in the areas other than where the database was developed].
    Kito K; Ishihara J; Kimira M; Takachi R; Hosoi S; Ishii Y; Iwasaki M
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2012 Sep; 59(9):700-11. PubMed ID: 23157126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Reliability of the questionnaire method of studying nutrition].
    Khaltaev NG; Deev AD
    Vopr Pitan; 1982; (4):23-6. PubMed ID: 7123892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Validation of a quantitative food-frequency questionnaire for use in Western Mali.
    Torheim LE; Barikmo I; Hatløy A; Diakité M; Solvoll K; Diarra MM; Oshaug A
    Public Health Nutr; 2001 Dec; 4(6):1267-77. PubMed ID: 11796090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Diet of two rural population groups of middle-aged men in Italy.
    Fidanza AA; Seccareccia F; Torsello S; Fidanza F
    Int J Vitam Nutr Res; 1988; 58(4):442-51. PubMed ID: 3243698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Dietary assessment methods evaluated in the Malmö food study.
    Callmer E; Riboli E; Saracci R; Akesson B; Lindgärde F
    J Intern Med; 1993 Jan; 233(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 8429287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire with 82-food items (FFQW82) for nutrition education].
    Adachi M; Watanabe M; Yamaoka K; Tango T
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2010 Jun; 57(6):475-85. PubMed ID: 20718205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Food photographs in nutritional surveillance: errors in portion size estimation using drawings of bread and photographs of margarine and beverages consumption.
    De Keyzer W; Huybrechts I; De Maeyer M; Ocké M; Slimani N; van 't Veer P; De Henauw S
    Br J Nutr; 2011 Apr; 105(7):1073-83. PubMed ID: 21092383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Reproducibility and validity of food intake measurements from a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire.
    Feskanich D; Rimm EB; Giovannucci EL; Colditz GA; Stampfer MJ; Litin LB; Willett WC
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1993 Jul; 93(7):790-6. PubMed ID: 8320406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The accuracy of children's self-reports of diet: Family Health Project.
    Baranowski T; Dworkin R; Henske JC; Clearman DR; Dunn JK; Nader PR; Hooks PC
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1986 Oct; 86(10):1381-5. PubMed ID: 3760429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The Dutch EPIC food frequency questionnaire. I. Description of the questionnaire, and relative validity and reproducibility for food groups.
    Ocké MC; Bueno-de-Mesquita HB; Goddijn HE; Jansen A; Pols MA; van Staveren WA; Kromhout D
    Int J Epidemiol; 1997; 26 Suppl 1():S37-48. PubMed ID: 9126532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Relative validity and reproducibility of a food frequency dietary questionnaire for use in the Italian EPIC centres.
    Pisani P; Faggiano F; Krogh V; Palli D; Vineis P; Berrino F
    Int J Epidemiol; 1997; 26 Suppl 1():S152-60. PubMed ID: 9126543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Diet history: questionnaire and interview techniques used in some retrospective studies of cancer.
    Jain M
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1989 Nov; 89(11):1647-52. PubMed ID: 2809042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A culture-sensitive quantitative food frequency questionnaire used in an African population: 1. Development and reproducibility.
    MacIntyre UE; Venter CS; Vorster HH
    Public Health Nutr; 2001 Feb; 4(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 11315681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Validation of the second version of a quantitative food-frequency questionnaire for use in Western Mali.
    Parr CL; Barikmo I; Torheim LE; Ouattara F; Kaloga A; Oshaug A
    Public Health Nutr; 2002 Dec; 5(6):769-81. PubMed ID: 12570885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Reproducibility and validity of an expanded self-administered semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire among male health professionals.
    Rimm EB; Giovannucci EL; Stampfer MJ; Colditz GA; Litin LB; Willett WC
    Am J Epidemiol; 1992 May; 135(10):1114-26; discussion 1127-36. PubMed ID: 1632423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Reproducibility of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire to assess the intake of fats and cholesterol in The Netherlands.
    Feunekes IJ; Van Staveren WA; Graveland F; De Vos J; Burema J
    Int J Food Sci Nutr; 1995 May; 46(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 7621083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Validation of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire developed in Denmark.
    Tjønneland A; Overvad K; Haraldsdóttir J; Bang S; Ewertz M; Jensen OM
    Int J Epidemiol; 1991 Dec; 20(4):906-12. PubMed ID: 1800429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Dietary patterns in high and low consumers of meat in a Swedish cohort study.
    Elmståhl S; Holmqvist O; Gullberg B; Johansson U; Berglund G
    Appetite; 1999 Apr; 32(2):191-206. PubMed ID: 10097025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Nutritional assessment of women working in the textile industry in Lodz from 1986 to 1989].
    Rafalski H; Kluszczyńska Z; Switoniak T
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 1991; 42(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 1844012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.