BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8655697)

  • 1. Macroscopic examination of prostatic specimens.
    Furness P
    J Clin Pathol; 1996 Feb; 49(2):187-8. PubMed ID: 8655697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Morphological assessment of radical prostatectomy specimens. A protocol with clinical relevance.
    Montironi R; Mazzucchelli R; Kwast T
    Virchows Arch; 2003 Mar; 442(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 12647209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. International society of urological pathology consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Egevad L; Srigley JR; Delahunt B
    Adv Anat Pathol; 2011 Jul; 18(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 21654361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radical prostatectomy: processing, staging, and prognosis. Parts I and II.
    Epstein JI
    Int J Surg Pathol; 2010 Jun; 18(3 Suppl):118S-123S. PubMed ID: 20484275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens].
    Compérat E; Camparo P; Srigley J; Delahunt B; Egevad L;
    Ann Pathol; 2013 Jun; 33(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 23790653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Editorial comment on: Prevalence of a tertiary Gleason grade and its impact on adverse histopathologic parameters in a contemporary radical prostatectomy series.
    Egevad L
    Eur Urol; 2009 Feb; 55(2):403. PubMed ID: 18718704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contemporary approaches for processing and handling of radical prostactomy specimens.
    Sung MT; Cheng L
    Histol Histopathol; 2010 Feb; 25(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 20017111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Diagnostic histopathology of prostate cancer].
    Kristiansen G
    Urologe A; 2013 Jul; 52(7):933-41. PubMed ID: 23784677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methods of radical prostatectomy specimen processing: a novel technique for harvesting fresh prostate cancer tissue and review of processing techniques.
    Bova GS; Fox WM; Epstein JI
    Mod Pathol; 1993 Mar; 6(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 8483892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prognostic factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens.
    Epstein JI; Amin M; Boccon-Gibod L; Egevad L; Humphrey PA; Mikuz G; Newling D; Nilsson S; Sakr W; Srigley JR; Wheeler TM; Montironi R
    Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 2005 May; (216):34-63. PubMed ID: 16019758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of radical prostatectomy specimens and diagnostic reporting of pathological findings.
    Montironi R; Lopez-Beltran A; Mazzucchelli R; Scarpelli M; Bollito E
    Pathologica; 2001 Jun; 93(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 11433618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noise and bias in microarray analysis of tumor specimens.
    Febbo PG; Kantoff PW
    J Clin Oncol; 2006 Aug; 24(23):3719-21. PubMed ID: 16822841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tissue sampling in the era of cost constraints.
    Humphrey PA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Mar; 101(3):247-8. PubMed ID: 8135175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Whole mounted radical prostatectomy specimens do not increase detection of adverse pathological features.
    Hollenbeck BK; Bassily N; Wei JT; Montie JE; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Rubin MA
    J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1583-6. PubMed ID: 11025709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Analysis and prognostic factors of the specimen of radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer].
    Fromont G; Molinié V; Soulié M; Salomon L
    Prog Urol; 2015 Nov; 25(15):999-1009. PubMed ID: 26519964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens. Therapeutic and prognostic implications.
    Epstein JI
    Pathol Annu; 1991; 26 Pt 1():159-210. PubMed ID: 2014139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Update on prostate pathology.
    Osunkoya AO
    Pathology; 2012 Aug; 44(5):391-406. PubMed ID: 22772344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [COMPARISON LOCALIZATION RESULTS BASED ON PROSTATE BIOPSY SPECIMENS WITH RESULTS BASED ON RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS IN PROSTATE CANCER].
    Nishikimi T; Tsuzuki T; Oohashi T; Yamauchi Y; Ishida R; Yamada H; Yokoi K; Kobayashi H
    Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 2016; 107(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 28442675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Handling of radical prostatectomy specimens: total or partial embedding?
    Vainer B; Toft BG; Olsen KE; Jacobsen GK; Marcussen N
    Histopathology; 2011 Jan; 58(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 21323948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Partial sampling of radical prostatectomy specimens: detection of positive margins and extraprostatic extension.
    Iremashvili V; Lokeshwar SD; Soloway MS; Pelaez L; Umar SA; Manoharan M; Jordá M
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2013 Feb; 37(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 23095506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.