These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8655800)

  • 1. Placement of observations for the efficient estimation of a psychometric function.
    Lam CF; Mills JH; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jun; 99(6):3689-93. PubMed ID: 8655800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating parameters for psychometric functions using the four-point sampling method.
    Lam CF; Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; He NJ; Mills JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Dec; 102(6):3697-703. PubMed ID: 9407661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determination of optimal data placement for psychometric function estimation: a computer simulation.
    Lam CF; Dubno JR; Mills JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):1969-76. PubMed ID: 10530021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing adaptive procedures for estimating the psychometric function for an auditory gap detection task.
    Shen Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 May; 75(4):771-80. PubMed ID: 23417238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fast adaptive estimation of multidimensional psychometric functions.
    DiMattina C
    J Vis; 2015; 15(9):5. PubMed ID: 26200886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold.
    Kontsevich LL; Tyler CW
    Vision Res; 1999 Aug; 39(16):2729-37. PubMed ID: 10492833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: a commentary.
    Klein SA
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1421-55. PubMed ID: 11800466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Model-free estimation of the psychometric function.
    Zychaluk K; Foster DH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1414-25. PubMed ID: 19633355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of maximum-likelihood estimators in nonintensive auditory psychophysics.
    Saberi K; Green DM
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Aug; 59(6):867-76. PubMed ID: 9270361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sampling plans for fitting the psychometric function.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Span J Psychol; 2005 Nov; 8(2):256-89. PubMed ID: 16255393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hybrid adaptive procedure for estimation of psychometric functions.
    Hall JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Jun; 69(6):1763-9. PubMed ID: 7240589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experience with a yes-no single-interval maximum-likelihood procedure.
    Leek MR; Dubno JR; He N; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 May; 107(5 Pt 1):2674-84. PubMed ID: 10830389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian active probabilistic classification for psychometric field estimation.
    Song XD; Sukesan KA; Barbour DL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):798-812. PubMed ID: 29256098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A quantitative analysis of psychometric functions for different auditory tasks in gerbils.
    Gleich O; Hamann I; Kittel MC; Klump GM; Strutz J
    Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 220(1-2):27-37. PubMed ID: 16901665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptive psychophysical procedures and imbalance in the psychometric function.
    Saberi K; Green DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jul; 100(1):528-36. PubMed ID: 8675846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of adaptive psychometric procedures based on the theory of optimal experiments and bayesian techniques: implications for cochlear implant testing.
    Remus JJ; Collins LM
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Apr; 69(3):311-23. PubMed ID: 17672419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian adaptive estimation of threshold versus contrast external noise functions: the quick TvC method.
    Lesmes LA; Jeon ST; Lu ZL; Dosher BA
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(19):3160-76. PubMed ID: 16782167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance metrics for an application-driven selection and optimization of psychophysical sampling procedures.
    Rinderknecht MD; Lambercy O; Gassert R
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207217. PubMed ID: 30485350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Algorithm for improving psychophysical threshold estimates by detecting sustained inattention in experiments using PEST.
    Rinderknecht MD; Ranzani R; Popp WL; Lambercy O; Gassert R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1629-1645. PubMed ID: 29748784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptive psychophysical methods for nonmonotonic psychometric functions.
    García-Pérez MA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Feb; 76(2):621-41. PubMed ID: 24197504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.