These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8655807)

  • 1. Consonant recognition for spectrally degraded speech as a function of consonant-vowel intensity ratio.
    Balakrishnan U; Freyman RL; Chiang YC; Nerbonne GP; Shea KJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jun; 99(6):3758-69. PubMed ID: 8655807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of consonant-vowel ratio modification on amplitude envelope cues for consonant recognition.
    Freyman RL; Nerbonne GP; Cote HA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 2046366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The importance of consonant-vowel intensity ratio in the intelligibility of voiceless consonants.
    Freyman RL; Nerbonne GP
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Sep; 32(3):524-35. PubMed ID: 2779197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.
    Nishi K; Trevino AC; Rosado Rogers L; García P; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e292-e304. PubMed ID: 28353522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consonant confusions in white noise.
    Phatak SA; Lovitt A; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1220-33. PubMed ID: 18681609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic-phonetic context considerations for speech recognition testing of hearing-impaired listeners.
    Revoile S; Kozma-Spytek L; Holden-Pitt L; Pickett J; Droge J
    Ear Hear; 1995 Jun; 16(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 7672474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consonant-vowel intensity ratios for maximizing consonant recognition by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kennedy E; Levitt H; Neuman AC; Weiss M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1098-114. PubMed ID: 9479764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consonant identification in consonant-vowel-consonant syllables in speech-spectrum noise.
    Woods DL; Yund EW; Herron TJ; Ua Cruadhlaoich MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1609-23. PubMed ID: 20329860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of consonant-vowel amplitude ratio in the recognition of voiceless stop consonants by listeners with hearing impairment.
    Sammeth CA; Dorman MF; Stearns CJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Feb; 42(1):42-55. PubMed ID: 10025542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.
    Fu QJ; Shannon RV; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Dec; 104(6):3586-96. PubMed ID: 9857517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of multichannel compression on vowel and stop-consonant discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Crain TR; Yund EW
    Ear Hear; 1995 Oct; 16(5):529-43. PubMed ID: 8654908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of training rate on recognition of spectrally shifted speech.
    Nogaki G; Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 17496666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consonant and vowel confusions in speech-weighted noise.
    Phatak SA; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Apr; 121(4):2312-26. PubMed ID: 17471744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition.
    Van Tasell DJ; Soli SD; Kirby VM; Widin GP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Oct; 82(4):1152-61. PubMed ID: 3680774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recognition of natural and time/intensity altered CVs by young and elderly subjects with normal hearing.
    Gordon-Salant S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Dec; 80(6):1599-607. PubMed ID: 3794065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recognition of voiceless fricatives by normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Zeng FG; Turner CW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Sep; 33(3):440-9. PubMed ID: 2232762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Closed-set effects in consonant confusion patterns.
    Bell TS; Dirks DD; Kincaid GE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Dec; 32(4):944-8. PubMed ID: 2601323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.