These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8655808)

  • 21. Speech coding in the auditory nerve: I. Vowel-like sounds.
    Delgutte B; Kiang NY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Mar; 75(3):866-78. PubMed ID: 6707316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Vowel discrimination in cats: thresholds for the detection of second formant changes in the vowel /epsilon/.
    Hienz RD; Aleszczyk CM; May BJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):1052-8. PubMed ID: 8759958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Formant-frequency discrimination of synthesized vowels in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and humans.
    Henry KS; Amburgey KN; Abrams KS; Idrobo F; Carney LH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):2073. PubMed ID: 29092534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Rollover effect of signal level on vowel formant discrimination.
    Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):EL52-8. PubMed ID: 18396921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on formant-frequency discrimination: Measurements and models.
    Carney LH; Cameron DA; Kinast KB; Feld CE; Schwarz DM; Leong UC; McDonough JM
    Hear Res; 2023 Aug; 435():108788. PubMed ID: 37224720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Frequency discrimination of stylized synthetic vowels with a single formant.
    Lyzenga J; Horst JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Sep; 102(3):1755-67. PubMed ID: 9301053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. FO-dependence, number alteration, and non-systematic behaviour of the formants in German vowels.
    Maurer D; Landis T
    Int J Neurosci; 1995 Nov; 83(1-2):25-44. PubMed ID: 8746747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. English vowel identification and vowel formant discrimination by native Mandarin Chinese- and native English-speaking listeners: The effect of vowel duration dependence.
    Mi L; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q; Guan J; Liu C
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():58-65. PubMed ID: 26768853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Difference limens for formant patterns of vowel sounds.
    Hawks JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):1074-84. PubMed ID: 8132901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of spectral prominence on perceived vowel quality.
    Beddor PS; Hawkins S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jun; 87(6):2684-704. PubMed ID: 2373803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with the same fundamental frequency.
    Assmann PF; Summerfield Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):327-38. PubMed ID: 2921415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Auditory nerve representation of vowels in background noise.
    Sachs MB; Voigt HF; Young ED
    J Neurophysiol; 1983 Jul; 50(1):27-45. PubMed ID: 6875649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Vowel identification by amplitude and phase contrast.
    Molis MR; Diedesch A; Gallun F; Leek MR
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 14(1):125-37. PubMed ID: 23007720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Absence of effect of coherent frequency modulation on grouping a mistuned harmonic with a vowel.
    Darwin CJ; Sandell GJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 May; 97(5 Pt 1):3135-8. PubMed ID: 7759653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of spectral flattening on vowel identification.
    Dubno JR; Dorman MF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Nov; 82(5):1503-11. PubMed ID: 3693692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Vowel formant discrimination II: Effects of stimulus uncertainty, consonantal context, and training.
    Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2141-55. PubMed ID: 11681391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The role of frequency modulation in the perceptual segregation of concurrent vowels.
    Culling JF; Summerfield Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Aug; 98(2 Pt 1):837-46. PubMed ID: 7642822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Saliency of Vowel Features in Neural Responses of Cochlear Implant Users.
    Prévost F; Lehmann A
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 49(6):388-397. PubMed ID: 29690785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Changes in vowel quality in post-lingually deafened cochlear implant users.
    Langereis MC; Bosman AJ; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF
    Audiology; 1997; 36(5):279-97. PubMed ID: 9305524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of roving level and spectral range on vowel formant discrimination.
    Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):EL264-70. PubMed ID: 21974502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.