These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Adaptive speckle reduction filter for log-compressed B-scan images. Dutt V; Greenleaf JF IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1996; 15(6):802-13. PubMed ID: 18215960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of logarithmic compression on estimation of the Nakagami parameter for ultrasonic tissue characterization: a simulation study. Tsui PH; Wang SH; Huang CC Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(14):3235-44. PubMed ID: 16177506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved diagnostics through quantitative ultrasound imaging. Hruska DP; Sanchez J; Oelze ML Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():1956-9. PubMed ID: 19964021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robust Scatterer Number Density Segmentation of Ultrasound Images. Tehrani AKZ; Rosado-Mendez IM; Rivaz H IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2022 Apr; 69(4):1169-1180. PubMed ID: 35044911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Echo-power estimation from log-compressed video data in dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging. Payen T; Coron A; Lamuraglia M; Le Guillou-Buffello D; Gaud E; Arditi M; Lucidarme O; Bridal SL Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1826-37. PubMed ID: 23879926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speckle analysis using signal to noise ratios based on fractional order moments. Dutt V; Greenleaf JF Ultrason Imaging; 1995 Oct; 17(4):251-68. PubMed ID: 8677561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasound Scatterer Density Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks and Patch Statistics. Tehrani AKZ; Amiri M; Rosado-Mendez IM; Hall TJ; Rivaz H IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2021 Aug; 68(8):2697-2706. PubMed ID: 33900913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A dynamic ultrasound simulation of a pulsating three-layered CCA for validation of two-dimensional wall motion and blood velocity estimation algorithms. Hu X; Zhang Y; Cai G; Zhang K; Deng L; Gao L; Han S; Chen J Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):131-143. PubMed ID: 29148586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phase-derivative imaging. II: Effects of beam diffraction and scatterer density. Oosterveld BJ; Romijn RL; Thijssen JM Ultrason Imaging; 1989 Jul; 11(3):153-74. PubMed ID: 2675450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Artifact reduction of ultrasound Nakagami imaging by combining multifocus image reconstruction and the noise-assisted correlation algorithm. Tsui PH; Tsai YW Ultrason Imaging; 2015 Jan; 37(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 24626567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Review of Envelope Statistics Models for Quantitative Ultrasound Imaging and Tissue Characterization. Destrempes F; Cloutier G Adv Exp Med Biol; 2023; 1403():107-152. PubMed ID: 37495917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Window-modulated compounding Nakagami imaging for ultrasound tissue characterization. Tsui PH; Ma HY; Zhou Z; Ho MC; Lee YH Ultrasonics; 2014 Aug; 54(6):1448-59. PubMed ID: 24835004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Statistical uncertainty in estimates of an effective scatterer number density for ultrasound. Chen JF; Zagzebski JA; Madsen EL J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Oct; 96(4):2556-63. PubMed ID: 7963038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of speckle in ultrasound images using fractional order statistics and the homodyned k-distribution. Prager RW; Gee AH; Treece GM; Berman LH Ultrasonics; 2002 May; 40(1-8):133-7. PubMed ID: 12159920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Statistics of boundaries in ultrasonic B-scan images. Shankar PM Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):268-80. PubMed ID: 25438836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-Rayleigh statistics of ultrasonic backscattered signals. Narayanan VM; Shankar PM; Reid JM IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1994; 41(6):845-52. PubMed ID: 18263274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A study on understanding the physical mechanism of change in ultrasonic envelope statistical property during temperature elevation. Omura M; Takeuchi M; Nagaoka R; Hasegawa H Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 48(6):3042-3054. PubMed ID: 33880793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of ultrasonic B-scans using non-Rayleigh statistics. Molthen RC; Shankar PM; Reid JM Ultrasound Med Biol; 1995; 21(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 7571126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]