These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8655872)

  • 1. Tooth sensitivity related to Class I and II resin restorations.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Apr; 127(4):497-8. PubMed ID: 8655872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preventing postoperative tooth sensitivity in class I, II and V restorations.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Feb; 133(2):229-31. PubMed ID: 11868844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Postoperative hypersensitivity and its relationship to preparation variables in Class I resin-based composite restorations: findings from the practitioners engaged in applied research and learning (PEARL) Network. Part 1.
    Berkowitz G; Spielman H; Matthews A; Vena D; Craig R; Curro F; Thompson V
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Mar; 34(3):e44-52. PubMed ID: 23631638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pulpal consideration of adhesive materials.
    Stanley HR
    Oper Dent; 1992; Suppl 5():151-64. PubMed ID: 1470544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical assessment of postoperative sensitivity in posterior composite restorations.
    Briso AL; Mestrener SR; Delício G; Sundfeld RH; Bedran-Russo AK; de Alexandre RS; Ambrosano GM
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):421-6. PubMed ID: 17910217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preventing sensitivity in Class II composite resin restorations.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Oct; 129(10):1469-70. PubMed ID: 9787546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Expediting Class II posterior composite placement.
    Trushkowsky R
    Dent Today; 2001 Oct; 20(10):96-8, 100-1. PubMed ID: 11665424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contemporary restoration of Class II caries. Direct posterior composites.
    Abel MG
    Dent Today; 2002 Nov; 21(11):94-7. PubMed ID: 12483933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct composite resin restoration of adolescent Class IV tooth fracture: a case report.
    Terry DA
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 2000; 12(1):23-9; quiz 30. PubMed ID: 11404887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive: effect on postoperative sensitivity.
    Perdigão J; Geraldeli S; Hodges JS
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Dec; 134(12):1621-9. PubMed ID: 14719760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term follow-up of composite resin restorations with self-etching adhesives.
    Unemori M; Matsuya Y; Hyakutake H; Matsuya S; Goto Y; Akamine A
    J Dent; 2007 Jun; 35(6):535-40. PubMed ID: 17428600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of sectional matrix systems in class II direct composite restorations.
    Lowe RA
    Dent Today; 2004 Oct; 23(10):108, 110-2. PubMed ID: 15559461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Amalgam restorations: postoperative sensitivity as a function of liner treatment and cavity depth.
    Gordan VV; Mjör IA; Moorhead JE
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):377-83. PubMed ID: 10823088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part II: in vivo investigations.
    Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2005 Apr; 18(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 15973822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Total-etch versus self-etch.
    Featherstone RW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Apr; 135(4):412, 414; author reply 414. PubMed ID: 15127862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pulpal effects of various restorations.
    Solomon C
    Ann Dent; 1998 Oct; 2(1):3, 6, 20. PubMed ID: 11305064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.
    van Dijken JW; Kieri C; Carlén M
    J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1319-25. PubMed ID: 10403459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Postoperative sensitivity of self etch versus total etch adhesive.
    Yousaf A; Aman N; Manzoor MA; Shah JA; Dilrasheed
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2014 Jun; 24(6):383-6. PubMed ID: 24953909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage of flowable composite resins when utilized as liners in Class II posterior composite resin restorations.
    Turner EW; Shook LW; Owens BM
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2002; 82(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 11979718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.